User talk:MaverickAC

November 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of WCW World Tag Team Champions worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. S_RX 21:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make such broad changes to a page, discuss it first on the talkpage (or at the WikiProject Wrestling page) to see if there is a consensus to do so. TJ Spyke 15:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to List of WCW World Tag Team Champions, you will be blocked from editing. TRU_CO 21:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TNA World Tag Team Championship

Please do not replace "and" for "&". It is per wikipedia rules that it should be written out as "and" and not "&".--WillC 08:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Tag Team Champions (WWE)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. TJ Spyke 21:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PWI Tag team reigns list

Why do you keep altering the lenghts of several combined tag team reigns on the PWI list. Those numbers are in accordance with the respective promotions tag team reigns pages but you keep changing them without a source. Unless you provide one I'll keep changing it back. Secretaria (talk) 16:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now I was able to verify and correct all the wrong lenghts in the awa tag team page and understand why you made the changes but it would have been apreciated that you justified them instead of ignoring me. Secretaria (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to World Wrestling Entertainment. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 03:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The Dark City Fight Club.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Dark City Fight Club.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:SCUM JimmyJacobs & SteveCorino.png

Thanks for uploading File:SCUM JimmyJacobs & SteveCorino.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Papacha. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of WWE Champions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AARDJ (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edit

Please do not update information on Billboard Hot 100, as you did here [1], unless you also properly update the source. Thank you. - eo (talk) 14:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism (April 2013)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. McPhail (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to WrestleMania XXX, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenny King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Hall of Fame

Greetings! I have reverted your changes to WWE Hall of Fame for two reasons.

1) Wikipedia has a stern policy regarding fair use images. If it isn't freely licensed we can't include it in a list.

2) We need to keep the blurbs brief and include only the highlights. Otherwise the page would be twice as long. Let's take this edit for example. Ric Flair is credited with being a 16 time world heavyweight champion. Does it really matter how many tag team belts he held? Also, his tag history is covered in the Four Horsemen blurb. Besides you can't just pick and choose who to have a detailed highlights list for.

I hope that clears things up. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 02:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that those images are already on Wikipedia. However, because they are fair use, we have to be very selective in how we use them. Using them on a bio to show what someone who died years ago looks like is justifiable. Using them on a list page where the images are essentially decorative is not.

As for length, it is true that there are no real limitations on length, but lets not forget the real purpose of the notes section: it's an overview, nothing else. I can assure you that Ric Flair's runs with the World Titles had a LOT more to do with his induction than anything else. If one wants to learn more about Ric Flair, it's Wikipedia so we have a page for him with more detail. And what does it say if we have 200 words about Flair, then only a sentence about (for example) Bobo Brazil. That's probably going against our neutrality policy. And yes you were cherrypicking, because one could easily expand the blurbs for anyone else (ie. Jerry Lawler, who may have won more titles than anyone else in the Hall of Fame) yet you only chose a couple to expand. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MaverickAC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MaverickAC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Illustrated withrdrawing recognition of world title status of WWF 1983-1985

Please stop deleting this information (particularly now that there is a reference for it) or I shall escalate. What exactly is your problem? Do you not believe that PWI made such a decision? 62.190.148.115 (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but who are you? I've been editing this section of the page for a number of years, and I'd like to make some points. First, the linked superscripts you added refer to outdated issues of the magazine. They don't reference anything current. Second, I'm assuming you neglected to notice the very first entry in the References section at the bottom of the page entitled "The New PWI", which was retrieved on August 16, 2012 from a post that was published in PWI's blog on December 16, 2009. In that post, the editor included an updated list of recognized world titles which was used as the basis for the list on the Wikipedia page. Nowhere in that list does it include any of the changes you made in Wikipedia.

Unfortunately, the blog was removed in 2015 due to inactivity. And since receiving your message, I've tried contacting PWI to clarify this matter twice with no response. I will keep trying, and in the meantime, I'll leave what you edited as is on the Wiki page. However, if and when I finally get a reply that's in my favor, I'll show you the e-mail(s) and delete all of your changes again. Thank you. MaverickAC (talk) 04:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a number of references in the article to support what is now on the page - mainly from the actual back issues of PWI from the time. These adequately explain the PWI family of magazines' policies at the time regarding various world titles - the withdrawal of world title status from the WWF 1983 and its reinstatement in 1985, the PWI family's interpretation of the NWA/WCW title situation in 1991-1993, the precise point at which AWA world title recognition was withdrawn.

I do not understand why you are apparently so keen to censor the actual history of Pro Wrestling Illustrated and its actual editorial stances over the years.

Incidentally, any emails that you personally receive from PWI amount to original research and are not acceptable sources on Wikipedia - see WP:OR. 10:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC) 62.190.148.115 (talk) 10:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am prepared to offer you a compromise - if you want, the World title section can be divided into separate subsections for PWI's (1) historical and (2) current retrospective stances. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 10:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. My main concern was the list. Thank you and my apologies.MaverickAC (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pro Wrestling Illustrated, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hi, I'm sure it is not meant to be disruptive editing, but looking through the history of this topic, it seems information is being removed without any reason. This may be due to you not leaving an edit summary, or otherwise. As these changes have been reverted, please discuss any changes on the articles talk page. You can also {{ping}} the editor/IP who has been reverting these changes. Please let me know if you need any help. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, given the fact that I've been editing this PWI list for a number of years based on factual information before someone showed up and all of a sudden and decided to butcher the particular section of the page in question without providing credible or up-to-date references, I feel like the shoe needs to be on the other foot with this person. I admit that I am not the original creator/editor of the page, but my edits were in no way disruptive and I was never reported. And then, whoever this user is had the nerve to report ME as the culprit?! That's like punching me in the face and then playing the victim after I retaliate. Not trying to be disrespectful, but it seems to me like you need to look into this situation a little further. Just sayin'...

Or do I need to report this person like I should've done from the start? Please, tell me what I need to do. Thank you.MaverickAC (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How long you've been editing an article before someone else comes along and makes edits has no bearing on whether or not you are vandalising the page - if you just blank off the newcomer's edits without explanation, then you become the one who is vandalising the page. As discussed above, I've made a compromise and split the section into two subsections dealing with PWI's (1) historical and (2) current positions regarding world titles. PWI's past positions are relevant and useful details which do belong on Wikipedia, and I do not see why you would object to their inclusion. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. My main concern was the list. Thank you and my apologies.MaverickAC (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: PWI listed the WCW Championship as having its world title status stripped on March 26, 2001, when the company officially folded. So, the period when the title was under WWF ownership between then and December 9, 2001, is not recognized by PWI. I could be wrong as the status may have changed, but you might want to confirm it and make the correction on the list if necessary. Thanks.MaverickAC (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MaverickAC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]