User talk:Maudslay II

January 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bachir Gemayel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 16:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Maudslay II

Thank you for creating Jean Talouzian.

User:Bennv3771, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please take note of the edits I made to this page. Namely, the usage of Template:DEFAULTSORT and Template:Lebanon-politician-stub.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bennv3771}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bennv3771 (talk) 16:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tony Frangieh Jr.

The article Tony Frangieh Jr. has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Trumpists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Trumpists has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC) AllegedlyHuman (talk) 07:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hello, please stop moving pages without discussion. nableezy - 16:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Shrike (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zrarieh massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zrarieh massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zrarieh massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shrike (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You have broken 1RR please revert yourself also calling WP:AGF edit as vandalism is violation of WP:NPA don't do it again --Shrike (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Free1Soul (talk) 11:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I reported you and the IP to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maudslay II.Free1Soul (talk) 11:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating stubs that will be deleted

In creating Nabatieh Fawka massacre and the Maarakeh massacre, you are inviting editors to speedy delete them. One incident, poorly reported, cannot survive scrutiny in terms of wiki policies. They will be deleted eventually , so your only option to conserve these valid annotations of indiscriminate Israeli aggression is to create a list (i.e. along t5he lines of List of massacres in the Palestinian territories), namely ( List of Israeli massacres in Lebanon and include them there. Nishidani (talk) 12:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)‎[reply]

@Nishidani: I'm sure that they can be expanded, same as the Zrarieh article, which I was not expecting that it would get this big. There is a lot of details that covered in other sources. Even if it's now a stub, that dosen't mean it would be deleted. -- Maudslay II (talk) 12:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Zrarieh article survived because one editor fixed it. No editors other than yourself are going to work the other two articles. If you know of a dozen sources for each of these articles, the majority in English, the default source for enwiki, by all means rapidly show they can be significantly expanded. I've examined sources for both and they are extremely limited, and I certainly haven't time to do others. There is a mass of information that is never used for this period: things like the economic war Israel waged to flood the Lebanese market with Israeli and Gazan agricultural produce and by price cutting cause the Lebanese sector it competed with to collapse. Much of the bombing hit industrial plants that were also competitive with Israel. And editors rarely note or know or add this kind of important detail, because it isn't sexy. Yet you can find lots of academic studies in English on the topics. Rather than test wiki's capacities to support the memorializing of the dead, the really important information for readers wanting to know what happened lies in those other areas. I haven't a source for it, but I am fairly certain that a good deal of the Shiite hostility was enflamed by such deflationary economic disturbances, as much as by the systematic barbarity of Israeli military operations. Zrarieh was an important centre for such produce.Nishidani (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nishidani: I'm willing to work the other two, and I tried to expand Nabatieh Fawka massacre, there's still room for more. -- Maudslay II (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is why FOARP has created the Iron Fist page, to include all those incidents that incurred in that period, do you see? It's OK to drill down but not if you lose focus. So if you start at here that's where Iron Fist also starts (officially) and Zrarieh is mentioned but not Maarakeh. I would look at expanding that section there at a higher level of detail first and only then consider what is worth a separate article. Same thing mention Qana but not Nabatieh Fawka.Selfstudier (talk) 13:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maudslay (that handle sounds like an English/Arabic portmanteau by the way). Selfstudier and FOARP are correct: these incidents will inevitably be registered on the Iron Fist page. If then, you find an abundance of material to expand them, they can then become independent main pages. You are approaching this from the wrong end.Nishidani (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nishidani: Check Maarakeh massacre. Now maybe a general part of it will be covered in iron fist, and could be mentioned in South Lebanon conflict, there are other details such as (First raid-Hospital raid-Berri reaction-Israel statement-Berri interview link-Imgae) which has no place in both these articles. -- Maudslay II (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is a big improvement. It needs more details, but certainly is more stable than the stub.Nishidani (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beit Hanan

Your del refers to the bus attack, I think in the wrong place?Selfstudier (talk) 13:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier: I think per WP:AFD you can do multiple proposed deletions in one discussion if they're related? -- Maudslay II (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Idk, you seem to have two separate discussions saying the same thing.Selfstudier (talk) 14:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent moves

I have noticed that you moved a number of "x of the Arab League" articles to "x of the Arab World". The undiscussed moves are not a problem per se (though others may disagree and I haven't checked properly), but from what I can tell, you haven't adjusted the content accordingly. So now we have articles, such as this, whose titles do not match the content. This is obviously a problem that needs to be addressed asap. M.Bitton (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deir Yassin pictures

I have seen for years pictures circulating on the net, allegedly of the Deir Yassin massacre, but clearly taken of another massacre, years lates. The only genuine pictures of the aftermath are, AFAIK, are of the orphans (like this), taken of them after they came under the care of ms Hind Husseini. That is, there were pictures taken, but they are still being censored by Israel. The commons-category of Deir Yussein needs to be cleaned up, cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Maarakeh bombing" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Maarakeh bombing. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#Maarakeh bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DXLB Muzikant (talk) 16:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1RR AGAIN

Please revert 1 Revert :[1] revert of [2]

2 Revert:[3] revert of [4] Its your second violation if you not revert yourself shortly you will be reported at WP:AE --Shrike (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first was pure vandalism, where he removed parts and moved the page without any discussion. The second was adding a template about a "hoax" because of a lack of sources, I added five sources. -- Maudslay II (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish we will ask admins if they agree with you.--Shrike (talk) 06:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

see [5] Shrike (talk) 07:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not discussing the merits of this Maudslay, but when in doubt, ask an expert or just revert. The essence of good editing is patience. As a token of good will you can still self-revert.Nishidani (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I did. -- Maudslay II (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted myself but the bot removed it here -- Maudslay II (talk)

Don't worry about the bot. All admins (and editors want is to see a readiness to play by the rules, admit error when one slips; don't argue with admins; try to avoid any sign of self-defensiveness; considerations of honour etc., and above all, exercise patience. In this area of Wikipedia you will encounter any number of editors who make 'moves' not to improve the text, but to test the other 'player', as if it were chess, rather than an encyclopedia. The aim if to checkmate the adversary, not to improve factual reportage. So it's a moral test, and the best solution is to embrace stringent standards for oneself, whatever the other editors may do.Nishidani (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What Nishidani said- aka don't let the bastards grind you down.Selfstudier (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way Maudslay, just as a matter of form (I see you are getting the 'treatment' today), I think you should just drop a note at the AE page, and briefly apologize for the revert. Pro forma. Otherwise it might appear that you are ignoring the matter. Nishidani (talk) 13:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nabatieh Fawka massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabatieh Fawka massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabatieh Fawka massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sir Joseph ^(talk) 13:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalil Ahmad Khalil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khalil Ahmad Khalil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely topic banned from the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Newslinger talk 12:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maudslay II, please use this topic ban as an opportunity to edit in less controversial topic areas. The policy on verifiability, policy against edit warring, and guideline on canvassing outline some of the expectations for editing on Wikipedia. You are welcome to file an appeal after making constructive contributions in other topic areas for a recommended minimum time period of six months. — Newslinger talk 12:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maudslay II: Your topic ban appeal has been declined, so the topic ban still applies, permalink. Johnuniq (talk) 03:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maudslayer

Hi, is there any reason why you have a new account? Did you forget the password of your previous account? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes -- Maudslay II (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I think it would be a good idea to show it in your userpage (just for clarity). Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TFD notice

Nomination for deletion of Template:Israel massacres in Lebanon ‎

Template:Israel massacres in Lebanon ‎ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. FOARP (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zrarieh massacre.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zrarieh massacre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Maudslay II/Sandbox

Template:Maudslay II/Sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahmed Kamel Asaad

The article Ahmed Kamel Asaad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A WP:BEFORE search revealed that this subject was merely the son of a notable politician, and was a failed political candidate, thus not passing WP:NPOL; additionally, no WP:SIGCOV was found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 05:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qana massacre (disambiguation)

The article Qana massacre (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TWODABS. Can be taken care of via a hatnote instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]