User talk:Maude~Duggel

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maude~Duggel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, because I'm working on some new articles! Maude~Duggel (talk) 17:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maude~Duggel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for my disruptive behavior, but can you unblock me? Maude~Duggel (talk) 01:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can start by telling exactly what you did wrong, how you will ensure it does not happen again, and specifically what productive contributions you will make instead. 331dot (talk) 01:49, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock discusion

I suggest also that you read and comprehend Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, which you have been advised to read in each block message you have received, before you make another unblock request. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for what I did wrong. Maude~Duggel (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) It would be best if you explain, in your own words, what was it that you did wrong? What will you change about your behavior if you get unblocked? byteflush _Talk 00:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I have the repeated creation of draft articles in main space, repeated incidents of incivility following final warning. Maude~Duggel (talk) 02:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Explain it in your own words, don't just copy and paste the block reason. Also, what would you change about your behavior in the future? How will you contribute to an encyclopedia? Don't be shy, feel free to expain what was going on, and what will change if you get unblocked. byteflush _Talk 02:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of this is giving me a headache now, all my favorites' articles (except for Nadezhda Panayotova) are now deleted! Now I'm gonna cry :( Goodbye Wikipedia! Maude~Duggel (talk) 22:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are reasons why that article was kept while the others weren't. If you can figure out why, and explain your understanding, then it would indicate that unblocking you might be beneficial to the Wikipedia project rather than harmful. I thought your contributions were well intentioned and technically competent, but clearly demonistrated a lack of understanding of Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You g u y s are immatures! I'm sick of you, leave me alone, all of you, I'm outta here! Oh, and by the way, your usernames sound like drag queen names! Where are all the old administrators for this website when you need them? Maude~Duggel (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've been an administrator for 8 years, I'm what you might consider "old" in that I'm probably old enough to be your grandparent, but I'm happy to call in a longer-establish admin for you, say Dlohcierekim (talk · contribs) for example. Everyone who has commented here has attempted to be helpful, and you have just answered with yet more incivility. Since you are retired, there is no need for you to reply if you will not heed the advice on how to make a proper unblock request. The only communication you make here while blocked should be about getting unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: Thanks for your kind words. In my long tenure walking this vale of tears, I've lost most of my sense of smell- comes in handy at work. But I can still recognize the unmistakeable odeur des conneries emanating from this conversation. Recommend simple disenganement. No point in further discussion.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brianna Silva

A tag has been placed on Draft:Brianna Silva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Draft created by blocked editor - review of the article adn availble references fail to provide reason to keep.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 18:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 08:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Šarūnas Kunigiškis

Hello, Maude~Duggel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Šarūnas Kunigiškis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]