User talk:Mattmclaren

Welcome!

Hello, Mattmclaren, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as OCOA Platform, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Andrew Y _talk 21:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OCOA Platform

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on OCOA Platform, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Andrew Y _talk 21:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solodev (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This was deleted last month and it's still basically the same from when it was deleted; I myself had even noted how searches were not finding the news we needed, I would not resubmit as it's simply too soon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Solodev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solodev (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Solodev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 18:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DGG ( talk ) 18:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Solodev has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Solodev. Thanks! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solodev (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability is marginal. With potential COI issue and previous deletion, this subject has a slightly higher bar to clear. [1] appears to be the strongest source but WP:CORP prefers non-local sources. Press releases and local or industry awards are not highly convincing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Solodev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 15:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mattmclaren, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 15:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solodev has been accepted

Solodev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– Joe (talk) 20:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solodev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solodev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solodev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mattmclaren, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Account Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mattmclaren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked some time ago due to sockpuppeting, related to my efforts to post an article about my company, Solodev. It is true that I created a second account with the company name; but I did so not out of malicious intent, but due to a misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. I now understand that role accounts are not allowed, and that multiple accounts per user are not allowed. I also reached out to several colleagues for assistance; I did not realize that was improper at the time either. I have no intention of working further on content about Solodev myself (though it's possible a colleague will make further efforts to submit a properly disclosed and referenced article), but I now that I better understand the standards around corporate accounts, sockpuppeting, and canvassing, I hope to have this "black mark" removed from my user page, and I would like to be able to explore Wikipedia editing around my various interests, if and when I have the time. In addition, I hope that the Solodev account page could be deleted (like User:Microsoft). I understand the account needs to remain blocked, but I think it's excessive to have a permanent negative notice attached to my mistakes early in my Wikipedia editing efforts. Thank you for your consideration. -Mattmclaren (talk) 17:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We need a fuller explanation of the relationships identified at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Solodev/Archive, particularly with Techcto. Just Chilling (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for the quick response Just Chilling. The account "Techcto" was the CTO of our company, Shawn Moore. Several of us were working to get the article posted, and we did not sufficiently understand Wikipedia's policies. As you can see from his username, while he did not fully disclose his connection, he was also not going out of his way to hide it, as "CTO" was part of his username. We regret running afoul of those policies, and we did not wish to impose on the good will of Wikipedia editors. Since last December, we have made an effort to better understand the requirements around disclosure, sock puppeting, and canvassing. We plan to observe them rigorously going forward. Mattmclaren (talk) 21:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing with blocking admin. Just Chilling (talk) 22:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just blocked Mattgarrepy (talk · contribs · count) and MarilynVaca (talk · contribs · count), both of whom are using the same IP as Mattmclaren. It's impossible to tell whether we're talking about one or more persons, meaning socks or meat, but the pattern described by Mattmclaren continues, and apparently no one at Solodev has learned anything, despite Mattmclaren's claims to the contrary. The two new accounts apparently think that making a disclosure on their userpage is sufficient. It's not. Wikipedia is not a platform for one or more editors to promote affiliated companies, bands, whatever. I will not consent to this user being unblocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking into it, Just Chilling and Bbb23. I do not understand, though, why my colleagues are being punished for my mistakes. I understand (now) the issues around canvassing and single purpose accounts, etc. I've sought out advice and information based on our experiences, and I see the problems with our approach that led to the sock puppet label. However, I want to emphasize that I never intended to deceive anybody about my identity. The only sock puppet account I created was Solodev, and I did it under the misunderstanding that having an official company account would be viewed as helpful, not harmful. I never used that account to vote, only to seek information from other users on their user pages and at the help desk. All the other accounts tied to my IP address were simply colleagues voicing their own views. We all understand now that "stacking the vote" with multiple accounts is unacceptable, and I am confident my colleagues won't be repeating that mistake, nor will I.

I'd like to reiterate my request to have my own account unblocked, not for the purposes of working on Solodev-related content, but to be able to work in other areas of Wikipedia. I'm not sure whether I will do so, but I don't think it's fair to have a permanent block notification on my account when I have learned the lessons and have no intention of repeating the actions of the past. I believe my colleage Matt Garrepy will be submitting an improved version of the Solodev article in the future, but I am no longer working on that, and I won't be chiming in if he does so.

In case it's relevant- my name is Matt McClintock. I chose the name "mattmclaren" because I'm a fan of the McLaren Formula One team, and because I saw that it's common for people to use pseudonyms here. I didn't want to hide my identity, I was just trying to match what I saw other people doing. -Mattmclaren (talk) 18:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mattgarrepy has relevant discussion. Just Chilling (talk) 21:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]