User talk:Matsukagan00b
|
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
What do users require in order to edit a semi-protected page?
- You need to have at least ten edits, and your account has to have been open for at least four days. WP:AUTOCONFIRM I have placed some helpful links on your page. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
How can users revert?AAAA:AAAAAAAAAAAAA (AAAA - AA AAAAAAAAAAAAA) 09:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)07:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC):D
- You have multiple possibilities to do that. Either you go to the history page and press undo (you can also choose multiple revisions and after watching the differences you can choose undo), or you are able to use tools like WP:Twinkle after a short install (not on your computer, in the preferences, see manual on the wikipage). mabdul 09:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
I cant upload a image!!!!!!
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Why cant i upload new versions of some images? I wanted to upload a new version of the Russian flag, but i couldn't. Matsukagan00b (Chat area - Vandalism) 04:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- First of all, why exactly would you want to do that? File:Flag of Russia.svg is a good SVG image used in hundreds of articles and almost every Wikipedia. Before you replace it, you should really discuss such changes first. Then, as for the technical reason you cannot replace the image, it's because it has been protected against such uploads at Wikimedia Commons. See Commons:Protection policy#Types of protection for further details. On a side note, there is no need for multiple exclamation marks ;-) Regards SoWhy 09:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
OK. Matsukagan00b (Chat area - Vandalism) 09:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC):)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shimba
[edit]A tag has been placed on Shimba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you kindly explain
[edit]What exactly is User:Matsukagan00b/HowTo:Vandalize Wikipedia all about or the recent addition you made to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion here [1]. Calmer Waters 02:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Pwned in action listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pwned in action. Since you had some involvement with the Pwned in action redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "E l e p h a n t"
[edit]A page you created, E l e p h a n t, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 06:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Guideline list, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Σ talkcontribs 17:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia
[edit]From browsing your contributions list I can see you still have a lot of problems with your edits. One problem is your usage of wikilinking. Please take your time to read this guide on that subject, it will probably save both you and a lot of other editors a lot of time making and reverting redundant edits. Also please do not create userpages of other users like you did here. Overall your edits seem to consist in a lot of extraneous stuff that could be described as disruption (for example this and spurious requests for undeletion like [2]). Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia and if you keep up this kind of editing you will end up being blocked in the very near future. My advice for you would be to get back to basics and read some of the texts linked as the first pillar on this site. That should set you straight regarding the differences between Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia. Cheers. --Saddhiyama (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Adoption request
[edit]Hi Matsukagan00b, I notice you've had a request for adoption up for a little while. As you are not currently active, I've removed the current request. If you would still like to be adopted, can I suggest that you contact one of the editors on the list of adopters? As Wikipedia is a volunteer project and many adopters are busy, a more pro-active approach would mean that you are more likely to be noticed. If you've got any questions, feel free to leave me a message. WormTT · (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)