User talk:Ainz Ooal Gown/Archives/2019/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ainz Ooal Gown. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Stop spamming the Thank You button
I don't need your thanks. Stay away from me and cease your harassment. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:51, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Masumrezarock100, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Conception (video game) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
A Big Thank you
Hello, dear Masum Reza. Thank you for all your tips and help, and also for recognizing my effort. This makes me very proud and motivated. I will work very hard. AryanTheArticleArtist (talk) 07:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Masumrezarock100/Sandbox/List of Rising of the Shield Hero episodes
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Masumrezarock100/Sandbox/List of Rising of the Shield Hero episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Page was deleted at the user's request (G8), the user also blanked this page (G7)
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
before you do WP:SPLIT
See at the page/ article first. Instead of splitting it, if it's less than 40 at WP:SIZESPLIT. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your tips and help.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 04:26, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- What I meant was, if the t.v. show is still airing and has an unknown number to the episodes. As the t.v. studio/ producer says it got 10 episodes, etc. Then it got 10 episodes. So, if the episode summaries aren't written in. But just the first episode, I wouldn't do WP:SPLIT. I would wait until all episodes are shown/ aired. As I had a concern too about it, at here.
- But you can try the WP:DRAFTS or sand box. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Tainted-wingsz:, I am using the sandbox to prepare the episode list. Another thing, I moved List of Sword Art Online episodes to List of Sword Art Online (season 1) episodes. Please have a look. I could only fix 2 known links.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 22:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)- I only meant about List of Domestic Girlfriend episodes. But in cases like the main page to Goblin Slayer, others, etc. And moving the episodes, is o.k. But the concern is that; "A t.v. show runs for a season (10 to 13 episodes.)" I wouldn't do a page move with the episodes that looks barren. (Some scattered episode summaries were written here and there.) And after a while it sticks out, as some one else wanted to merge it back. Because of that. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Tainted-wingsz:, I am using the sandbox to prepare the episode list. Another thing, I moved List of Sword Art Online episodes to List of Sword Art Online (season 1) episodes. Please have a look. I could only fix 2 known links.
- But you can try the WP:DRAFTS or sand box. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sword Art Online into List of Sword Art Online all season episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- My apologies. I will be more careful from now on.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 00:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
you understand it?
you understand it? He translate it from Thai article with Google translate. 58.8.169.80 (talk) 12:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- I know but you could have improved it. I would love to do so if I know anything about this article.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 12:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Romaji
Hi. About this, can you please explain the reason? During episode 6, characters clearly state around minute 9 that the bird is known as shinchō no seijin (shin + chō). Where does kamitori come from?--Sakretsu (talk) 23:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Sakretsu: Listen I am not experienced in Japanese. I just translated the Kanji using Google translate. I know Google is sometimes makes mistakes but when converting kanji to romaji it is generally right. But you can see the official website for the episode name or you can just visit the funimation page you can see the title there.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 02:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)- Don't rely on machine translators. If you don't know Japanese, I suggest you not to risk undoing other users' correct edits... It's shinchō (source). Regards--Sakretsu (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Sakretsu: And you should not cite unreliable sources. I reverted your edit again because that Romaji and Kanji didn't match. Listen I don't want to involve into any edit war. I think we need third opinion. If you think you are right then please cite a reliable reference. I opened a discussion at WT:Anime. If anyone can confirm it I will close this issue.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 10:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Sakretsu: And you should not cite unreliable sources. I reverted your edit again because that Romaji and Kanji didn't match. Listen I don't want to involve into any edit war. I think we need third opinion. If you think you are right then please cite a reliable reference. I opened a discussion at WT:Anime. If anyone can confirm it I will close this issue.
- Don't rely on machine translators. If you don't know Japanese, I suggest you not to risk undoing other users' correct edits... It's shinchō (source). Regards--Sakretsu (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry about that. Clearly I did not look closely enough at the article. S0091 (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- No it's no big deal.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 01:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk to us about talking
The Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.
We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.
We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.
We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.
You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:
- First, sign up your group here.
- Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
- Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
- When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
- What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
- What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
- What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
- What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
- Finally, please go to Talk pages consultation 2019 on Mediawiki.org and report what you learned from your group. Please include links if the discussion is available to the public.
You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.
Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.
You can read more about the overall process on mediawiki.org. If you have questions or ideas, you can leave feedback about the consultation process in the language you prefer.
Thank you! We're looking forward to talking with you.
Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there!
Ok It's no big deal. I think I am still a rookie that's why I revealed that much information on my userpage.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 21:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Just remember that the internet is forever, and nothing you put out goes away. Suppression can help, but it only goes so far if something's been out there long enough. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello @TonyBallioni: I know this request is kinda stupid. But can you protect my user page so that no IP, auto confirmed user can't edit it. I know it is not a good reason. I mean if anyone edit my page I want them to be extended confirmed.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 04:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
And can you also delete this talk archive page? I have moved the archive page. So I don't need this page. I tried to use speedy delete template it didn't work.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 05:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting the page.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 05:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- No problem. I’m not going to protect the page at this time, because I don’t see any reason for it. If people start vandalizing it, let me know, and I’ll see what I can do. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Just so you know I've removed more information from your information page - if the answer to the question "could someone use this information to track me down" is "yes", then it's really not a good idea to put on Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 17:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
I don't care if you copy my templates or not
What part of leaving me alone do you not get? Was it really necessary to tag me in your edit summary just because you decide to be a copycat and mimic the way I format my userpage? I'm telling right now that it is not; it is VERY annoying. Stop harassing me and leave me alone. This is your final warning. Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Sk8erPrince: Are you tracking my edits or something like that? Listen some days ago User:Diannaa left me message that "Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution". So I added your name in it. I didn't mean to offend you or anything. Besides it doesn't work as "mention" as I didn't receive any notification stating that "Your mention of Sk8erPrince was sent". I also never received any failed notification. So I assume you are tracking me. Another thing you can find the message in February 2019 archives page. Also I know you will write something like "do not mention me" after this.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 09:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)- What benefit would I gain by stalking you? I'm not in the least bit interested in you at all. Linking userpages DOES mention other users, and if you want proof, here you go. Yes, that also means you just tagged a sysop for no reason other than just cuz. You also COMPLETELY misinterpreted what WP:CWW actually means, so I highly suggest that you give it a thorough read. For the last time, just leave me out of everything you do. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't know that.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 09:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't act like a child. Why do you always take my comments as harassment? It is beyond your age to act like a child. I admit I called you something that can be considered as personal attack but I was a newbie then. I didn't read the policies properly. After that I apologized to you but instead forgiving me you continued to hold a grudge against me. Editors are supposed to co-operate with each other. Please learn how to forgive people.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 09:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)- That's super rich, coming from the child himself. I have every single right to refuse to work with you, especially after that awful first impression you gave me. You talk as if you absolutely deserve my forgiveness, but with the way I see it, I don't think so. You've burnt a bridge that you cannot possibly repair at this point in time, because I have still yet to see any significant improvements from you. You're definitely not the saint you think you are, so drop the innocent act. I'm not buying it. Lastly, when someone points out that you are wrong, just admit it and stop making up excuses. Goodbye. Sk8erPrince (talk) 10:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am not a child. I am almost 16. You are the one who doesn't know how to behave properly in society. It is is internet and you are unpaid doesn't mean you can't be behave properly. You should learn to forgive. If you are that much older than me then why you don't know how to deal with juniors.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 10:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Side concern
- The one about WP:CWW, if you do WP:SPLIT and you can not copy a short sentence/ a paragraph, from the main page. (But not user pages.) And in your own words. Like that time at That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime to List of That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime characters. What you didn't do was on; [[That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime]] (the main page) was or say; "moved the characters to [[List of That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime characters]]". And I had to add that by using the item at Template:Copied. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
IABot
This bot is introducing errors[1], which I have corrected[2]. DrKay (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- @DrKay: Thanks for your assistance. Please report it to it's operator User:Cyberpower678, if you haven't done it.
Sincerely,
Masum Reza☎ 15:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Your edits on service award
Why did you revert me edits, they were not invalid. SportsFan007 (talk) 21:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)SportsFan007
- @SportsFan007: Thanks for leaving your edits on WP:Service awards/Table. Unfortunately I had to revert your edits as all links presented in your edits are red. Please do not add awards that doesn't exist. I am not going to revert your latest revision as I opened a discussion at User talk:Oshwah.
Sincerely,
Masum Reza☎ 05:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Masumrezarock100: Please see my responses on the discussion that you opened. SportsFan007 (talk) 06:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)SportsFan007
- @SportsFan007: Listen this is my talk page, so you don't have to ping me every time you post a message. I get notified automatically. If there is a discussion at other talk page, then ping me. What I mean is every talk page owners gets notified automatically when someone posts a message on it. So there is no need to ping me also don't ping Oshwah on his talk page. About the award, is there any proof that it will be created?
Sincerely,
Masum Reza☎ 07:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @SportsFan007: Listen this is my talk page, so you don't have to ping me every time you post a message. I get notified automatically. If there is a discussion at other talk page, then ping me. What I mean is every talk page owners gets notified automatically when someone posts a message on it. So there is no need to ping me also don't ping Oshwah on his talk page. About the award, is there any proof that it will be created?
- @Masumrezarock100: Please see my responses on the discussion that you opened. SportsFan007 (talk) 06:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)SportsFan007
Savage Warriors
In your edit on Savage Warriors, is it fair to say that we can include these conclusions without a source?[3] 73.168.15.161 (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- You can play the game to see if those are true.
Sincerely,
Masum Reza☎ 12:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)- That is about the weakest defense ever, thank you. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new version of the iOS Wikipedia app. It has for example syntax highlighting and new toolbars to make it easier to write wikitext. It also has night mode, a find-on-page function and other things. You can give feedback and suggestions. [4]
Changes later this week
- When you look at your watchlist or the recent changes page you can use the new filters for edit review. There you can choose tags to filter different edits. Empty tags will no longer be shown. [5]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 February. It will be on all wikis from 28 February (calendar).
Meetings
-
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 27 February at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The Wikipedia app for Android will invite users to add Wikidata descriptions to Wikidata objects that have Wikipedia articles but no Wikidata descriptions. It will only invite users who have added a number of Wikidata descriptions in the app without being reverted. This is to avoid spam and bad edits. You can read more and leave feedback.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Your signature
Hi, please remove the <br /> tags from your signature, they are in breach of WP:SIGAPP. You can also shorten your siganture by making use of the fact that the style= attribute is valid on all HTML elements. At present, you have this:
<br/>Sincerely,<br/>[[User:Masumrezarock100|<u><i><span style="color:#087643;font-face:arial;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Masum Reza</span></i></u>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Masumrezarock100|<span style="color:orange;">☎</span>]]</sup>
which can be simplified to
Sincerely, [[User:Masumrezarock100|<u><i style="color:#087643;font-face:arial;font-weight:bold;text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Masum Reza</i></u>]][[User_talk:Masumrezarock100|<sup style="color:orange;">☎</sup>]]
Also, please note that the shadowing can sometimes make surrounding text unreadable with some browsers, see this screenshot that I took when viewing this edit. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: Holy cow is that messy my signature makes the text. Well I will shorten my signature. Thanks for your advice. May I ask another question, which browser did you use?
Sincerely,
Masum Reza☎ 03:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)- Opera 36.0 --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: Is there any alternative to shadowing method. Sincerely, Masum Reza☎ 16:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Opera 36.0 --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pokémon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
The article Pokémon you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Pokémon for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)