User talk:Master Editz Delhi

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 09:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 09:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Article is correct. Why are you deleting it Master Editz Delhi (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have consulted with 3 of the Wikipedia experts they also suggested the same. If you continue so we will restrict you from editing Master Editz Delhi (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restrict me from editing? Are those legal threats? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 10:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not correct that we are fighting each other. We together can stand together and can make the article fit for Wikipedia Master Editz Delhi (talk) 10:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hero Dashboard. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Adakiko (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Master Editz Delhi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Master Editz Delhi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Master Editz Delhi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Master Editz Delhi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 10:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hero Dashboard per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hero Dashboard. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 11:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]