User talk:MaryElleOrr

This is MaryElleOrr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caisleáin Óir (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caisleáin Óir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 14:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaryElleOrr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 14:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi MaryElleOrr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Caisleáin Óir has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Caisleáin Óir. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caisleáin Óir (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's own website and a spam link to purchase a book are not independent sources and YouTube is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caisleáin Óir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Caisleáin Óir has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Caisleáin Óir. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I've since updated references. I wonder about the youtube link though - I understand it's not seen as a good resource, however the entire musical is uploaded to view, so that's where I got the plot information from. Or does the plot source not need to be given? Not sure I fully understand. MaryElleOrr (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary. Theroadislong (talk) 17:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:REFB for help with formatting sources, the references should be placed directly after the content that they support and please note that "This production won the “Spirit of AIMS / Adjudicator’s Special Award” in the Sullivan category at the AIMS Annual Awards Ceremony in 2006" is NOT a reference. Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caisleáin Óir (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all of this is unsourced (the entire development, production history, plot sections), and of the sources that are there one seems to be primary and the other two are pretty routine coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caisleáin Óir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 19:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caisleáin Óir (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caisleáin Óir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Caisleáin Óir (novel)

Hello, MaryElleOrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caisleáin Óir (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Caisleáin Óir

Hello, MaryElleOrr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caisleáin Óir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]