User talk:Marvoir

Welcome!

Hello, Marvoir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marvoir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Martin Allen (publicist)

Hello, Marvoir,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Martin Allen (publicist) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Allen (publicist) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Killer Moff (talk) 11:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marvoir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New foundations.

Bonjour, Marvoir. Je vous ai laissé un message. Je n'ai pas eu de réponse, mais je comprendrais que vous hésitiez, compte tenu de l'ambiance qui règne là-bas.

Nous sommes un groupe de contributeurs qui essayent de réfléchir à la refondation de wikipédia, notamment par la rédaction d'une charte que nous aimerions proposer au vote. Depuis quelques années, un groupe restreint a pris le contrôle de l'encyclopédie et lui impose une ligne éditoriale aux antipodes de la neutralité affichée (présenter comme des faits ce qui ne sont que des allégations, qualifier des hommes politiques comme Mélenchon ou Asselineau de complotistes et antisémites,...). Quiconque s'y oppose se voit sanctionné. S'il s'agit d'un compte récent il est bloqué définitivement (pas là pour contribuer sereinement). Même des contributeurs anciens peuvent être bloqués, comme Thontep qui a été bloqué pour deux mois. Si une réflexion ne s'organise pas, cela n'a aucune raison de changer. C'est pourquoi je vous ai proposé de prendre contact à l'adresse de courriel que vous trouverez en suivant les liens. Si vous hésitez à communiquer de la sorte, nous venons juste d'ouvrir un forum sur lequel vous pouvez vous inscrire et exposer vos vues de façon parfaitement anonyme. Voici l'adresse du forum: http://ora-et-labora.forumactif.com. Je reproduis ici pour votre commodité nos revendications de base :

Demander que les dates de renouvellement des administrateurs soient automatiquement communiquées sur les pdd des utilisateurs.
Exiger un quorum pour valider une élection.
Limiter le mandat des administrateurs dans le temps.
Limiter leurs attributions à la maintenance et à la lutte contre le vandalisme.
Définir de manière très claire ce que doivent être les sources et comment elles doivent être utilisées.

Bien cordialement,

Michel --Agilă veveriță (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Agilă veveriță. Je vous ai répondu hier à 8h15. Voici ce que je disais :

"Je pense que, sur la page Discussion:Attaque chimique de Douma, il y a typiquement un passage en force en faveur de la diabolisation de la Russie et que cela justifie votre initiative, mais vu mon expérience désagréable des actions de groupe, je ne souhaite pas participer à des réunions à l'extérieur de Wikipédia. Votre dernière proposition : « Définir de manière très claire ce que doivent être les sources et comment elles doivent être utilisées » me semble très bonne. Actuellement, les sources réputées « de qualité » sont à peu près uniquement les médias qui ont la double particularité d'être financés par des gens proches d'Israël (et il y a un bellicisme anti-russe et anti-syrien chez Israël et ses proches) et d'être subventionnés par le gouvernement, ce qui est la forme légalisée de la vénalité de la presse. Il serait peut-être possible d'y changer quelque chose en recueillant des exemples de mauvais journalisme dans les sources "de qualité", mais il faudrait pour cela une certaine masse numérique de contributeurs "confirmés", c'est-à-dire relativement anciens et dont les contributions montrent qu'ils ne sont pas sur Wikipédia dans la seule intention de modifier son orientation. Quand je vois combien peu de gens s'aperçoivent de ce qu'il y a d'énorme dans la conduite de la Coalition contre la Russie et la Syrie, je ne suis pas optimiste sur la possibilité de réaliser ce que j'envisage."

Je participerai peut-être au forum que vous avez créé, si je crois avoir quelque chose d'intéressant à apporter, mais pour être efficace, j'aurais sûrement besoin d'un gros travail d'enquête et de réflexion, au détriment d'autres occupations qui m'intéressent plus que Wikipédia. En tout cas, s'il m'est possible d'ajouter mon appoint numérique lorsqu'une de vos réformes sera proposée à Wikipédia, je le ferai. Marvoir (talk) 06:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, Marvoir. En attendant votre paricipation au forum, que je souhaite, je vous donne un lien vers un article de Jonathan Cook concernant l'affaire de Douma : https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2018-04-28/the-west-closes-its-ears-to-douma-testimony/. Si je tombe sur des sources intéressante et si vous le souhaitez, je vous les communiquerai.--Agilă veveriță (talk) 00:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Marvoir, je viens de lire un article sur l'affaire Skripal sur la chaîne RT (honnie sur wp (fr)). Il est intéressant parce qu'il donne des liens vers deux versions successives du New York Times. Voici le lien : https://www.rt.com/news/425886-opcw-novichok-grams-correction/

Cordialement.--Agilă veveriță (talk) 22:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Très intéressant. Je vais essayer de faire passer ça dans l'article de la Wikipédia française. Marvoir (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Agilă veveriță. J'ai lu un peu tout ce que j'ai trouvé sur cette affaire. La nuit portant conseil, je réfléchirai demain matin à ce que je mettrai dans l'article (que j'ai un peu complété sur les deux versions de la contamination de Nick Bailey). Marvoir (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Agilă veveriță. J'ai apporté quelques compléments à l'article fr:Empoisonnement de Sergueï et Ioulia Skripal. Marvoir (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Marvoir. Je suis désolé d'avoir mis autant de temps à donner signe de vie, mais j'ai pris quelques jours de repos. Je suis heureux que les sources que je vous ai fournies aient pu vous être utiles et je vous remercie de les avoir citées. Je vous joins un lien vers une autre source qui me semble également intéressante : http://syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers/briefing-note-update-on-the-salisbury-poisonings. Malheureusement, je ne suis pas certain qu'elle soit utilisable, je crains que les tenants d'un point de vue que vous connaissez en récusent les auteurs au motif qu'il seraient des conspirationnistes pro-russes et antiaméricains. J'aimerais avoir avec vous des échanges plus libres, aussi je me permets de vous rappeler que vous avez mon adresse de courriel.

Bien cordialement,

--Agilă veveriță (talk) 22:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Je ne sais pas avec quelle régularité vous consultez cette page, je vais donc vous faire savoir que vous avez eu ce message par un moyen détourné, veuillez m'en excuser.--Agilă veveriță (talk) 22:44, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marvoir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Venuleius Saturninus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Venuleius Saturninus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs tr least some citations from a more modern source. A great deal more is known about ancient roman history than it was150 years ago, and many things have been re-evaluated citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DGG : what is now known about Venuleius Saturninus that is not in the article I quoted ? Marvoir (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marian apparition of La Salette (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caorongjin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Our Lady of La Salette instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It would be best to merge the contents from this article into the preexisting Our Lady of La Salette.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marian apparition of La Salette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Caorongjin 💬 19:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marvoir! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Caorongjin 💬 19:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK User:Caorongjin, I merged the draft in Our Lady of La Salette. Marvoir (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Venuleius Saturninus

Hello, Marvoir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venuleius Saturninus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marian apparition of La Salette

Hello, Marvoir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marian apparition of La Salette, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marian apparition of La Salette

Hello, Marvoir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marian apparition of La Salette".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]