User talk:Marudubshinki/Archive 32

Image copyright problem with Image:AtptEGTVV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AtptEGTVV.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Tawker 06:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --maru (talk) contribs 06:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snowtropr's recent edits

Hey, just a heads up: He's back once again :) --Deckiller 18:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not anymore. --maru (talk) contribs 19:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ^ ^ --Deckiller 22:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just remember... if the fuzz catches wind, you're going down with me. --maru (talk) contribs 22:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair deal. --Deckiller 22:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Palpatine as a ruler" AfD

Changed my vote here and left a comment. Someone must have put goofy pills in my coffee this morning. Perhaps there could be an article on "Star wars national leaders" that would cover some of his leadership aspects. I haven't read it all, but I'm assuming those articles are becoming rather large and begging to be split into baby articles. As I familiarize myself with how Wikipedia has the Star Wars stuff set up, perhaps I can offer some suggestions (sans goofy pills!). Cheers!

BTW: the "look at your hand" pic is awesome. --SpencerTC 00:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I can't claim any originality (aside from the caption)- I stole it from another user.

That article idea is interesting, but there aren't actually that many leaders that are that interesting; the authors (and indeed, Lucas himself) tend to find Palpatine one of the most fascinating characters, and so, he is very well developed. The only ones that come anywhere close in terms of being fleshed out would have to be Tarkin, Leia, and maybe Mon Mothma. --maru (talk) contribs 01:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelion userbox

I agree, I also prefer Asuka over Rei. ^ ^ --Deckiller 01:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We are so congenial together! Let's get married, you and I! :) --maru (talk) contribs 01:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Lauren might kill me =P --Deckiller 01:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SW copyvios

Yeah, all these recent copyvios by our fellow editors are killing me. I'll try and clean them up soon, although I'm in the gutter today, so I don't know how much I'll be able to do... --Deckiller 19:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The real killer for me is that I own almost all these books- just not with me. :( --maru (talk) contribs 20:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Planet of Twilight copyvio?

I barely used the Wookieepedia article. I used a few terms such as 'cult' and 'backwater' but that was the extent of it. Wookieepedia gave me close to NO information, as they only had a "Publisher's Synopsis" so I went to many other sources to compile the article. --Dark jedi requiem 19:42, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You copied entire phrases. --maru (talk) contribs 20:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used: "dreaded backwater world", "religious cult", and "hellbent". I used 6 words out of their 113. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark jedi requiem (talk • contribs)

Srotac RfD

You may take vote on WP:RfD (Feb 21) about this redirect. --Pavel Vozenilek 20:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The deed is done. --maru (talk) contribs 20:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert format

hominem&diff=41684666&oldid=41327817 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ad hominem&diff=41684666&oldid=41327817

I believe that's vandalism. Now since you seem to have a "standard" way to revert among you admins, I'll leave it you to you you. -Raijinili 04:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's taken care of; we don't have a standard way of reverting so much as the rollback software tool are so much better than manually reverting that nobody in their right mind ever does it unless they want to leave a message in the edit summary. --maru (talk) contribs 04:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

And, as you asked, the name is just something I came up with some time ago (in high school, by my reckoning). It's meant to have at least two ways of reading, i.e. Zero-bot (0-bot) and also, a sort of German accented Ze Robot (a la Kraftwerk). Cheers! --Zerobot 04:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting. My user name is not nearly so well thought out. :( --maru (talk) contribs 04:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]