User talk:Martin taleski
Warning
[edit]You are about to violate Wikipedia:3RR on Clement of Ohrid. Refrain from further reverts, or you will be blocked. /FunkyFly.talk_ 02:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Despite my warning, you just broke Wikipedia:3RR, and you will be reported. /FunkyFly.talk_ 03:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC
You broke the rule too... you had more than three reverts, so... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin taleski (talk • contribs)
- You are heading towards another 3RR violation. Do not revert against consensus without proper sourcing. /FunkyFly.talk_ 19:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok now you are truly in danger in violating it. Do not revert again or you will be blocked. /FunkyFly.talk_ 19:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- You broke it again despite my warnings, and you will be blocked again. /FunkyFly.talk_ 20:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- You are heading towards another 3RR violation. Do not revert against consensus without proper sourcing. /FunkyFly.talk_ 19:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
--
Blocked
[edit]Khoikhoi 03:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, please don't try to evade your block, I've had to reset it because of that. Thanks, Khoikhoi 19:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Blocked again
[edit]Heimstern Läufer 21:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Martin taleski (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i know that i have violated the 3RR rule, but my reverts are sourced, and i have displayed my sources in the talk page of the article. However, the people that are reverting my edits have not shown a single source that supports their claim! Therefore i demand to be unblocked and allowed to edit the article about St. Clement according to the internationally recognized sources!
Decline reason:
Sorry, but that's not at all how 3RR works. You need to just understand this, for the future: if you revert war, there's a very good chance you're going to get blocked. So, instead of revert warring, please consider dispute resolution -- it'll be easier in the long run. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In reply to your demand that I unblock you: I agree entirely with Luna's decline. That's all I have to say. Heimstern Läufer 04:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
3RR
[edit]You obviously know about the rule now, since you've been blocked for it, several times. As much as you obviously don't agree with the previous sort order for Macedonia, that doesn't allow you to edit war until everyone else gives up and waits for you to go away. You've already hit three reverts in the past 24 hours (or 4, since I imagine the IP revert is you as well), I suggest you address the specific questions mentioned on the talk page, rather than just restating subjective opinion, before reverting more. -Bbik 01:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)