User talk:MartinBot/Oct06

Please stop your vandalism

I was attempting to correct the Disc tumbler lock article and you f*cking bot vandalized it. Please stop it.--Fahrenheit451 04:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Incorecctly reverted

Someone made some blankings to the article The Game. Every time I try to put the info back, the bot keeps reverting it. Here's the pair of diffs to show you what I mean. [1] and [2] --Ted87 01:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

War of the BOTS!!!

Just thought I'd point out this series of edits:

User:129.21.230.148 vandalises Lucas [3]
User:129.21.230.149 changes the vandalism slightly [4]
User:AntiVandalBot reverts the changes by 129.21.230.149 to the version by 129.21.230.148 (remember, both are vandalism containing profanity) [5]
User:MartinBot reverts AntiVandalBot to the version by 129.21.230.149 [6]
Finally a human, User:Tom harrison comes along and reverts everyone back to the way the article was to begin with [7].

Are we now having Bot Wars? I've seen similar things happen before. For a while Tawkerbot and AntiVandalBot were edit warring on AntiVandalBot's userpage. Is there some way to stop this? ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 18:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dont block Irfanhasmit

hes fooling around so dont block him.

bot

Hi, I'm the webmaster for Norwood School in Bethesda, MD and am trying to clean up our entry as per the request of my headmaster. I don't want your bot to block me. Thank you, User:Demetri

Pepperland (song)

Hi, I just wanted to say that this change was a mistake. I finally corected it [8]. --69.79.196.112 19:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MartinBot had a resource conflict with User:Tawkerbot2

It appears to have thought a Tawkerbot2 edit was vandalism. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tawkerbot2&diff=prev&oldid=83144961.

BTW: I suggest you put talk links into your sig. It takes up a lot of room in the editor, but is worth it.

BTW 2: You might post using the Bot account when you want people to reply here. I was looking at your page for the post above and wondering why it wasn't in the history for your other talk page when I realized I had the wrong talk page.

Will (Talk - contribs) 05:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't post using this account, you might either put a link here in your normal signature or reply here to all posts. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think linking your pages together is required. However, that problem is not completely relevant. When you start a new section at someone else's talk page, you might consider starting the section with a "Please reply here link". I did that on the section on my talk page to show you what I was talking about. The formatting is an experiment. Play with it for your self.

The reason I talked about replying on the bot's talk page (in this case, here) was to keep the entire conversation in one place. Suppose user X comes along with a relavant point. They have only half the conversation (my part) to go on. Even if they know where the other half is, it would take time to piece the conversation together. I watch this page and would see it. Or you could only put a note on my talk page to check this section for updates. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to vandalism

Reverted vandalism to another vandalism on Cracker (pejorative) today. -THB 19:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i accedently turned it back to that version i ment to fix that vandalism.--Fang 23 19:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC) LA E[reply]

Block 4.158.45.200

Block 4.158.45.200. It seems he did not fully understood your "last warning" message. He is continuing to vandalize "David Eigenberg" A Raider Like Indiana 00:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - the bot isn't an admin, and so can't block users. The best place to ask is WP:AIV Mart inp23 14:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC) ok im really sorry that i scewed up your website i dint think i would do anything i wont do it agian[reply]

Userpage notice format

Good afternoon. The notice that this bot adds to the vandal's userpage includes a section header. In cases where the bot runs multiple times against a single page, the section headers really disrupt the list of notices and make it harder for an admin reviewer to determine when the vandal was last blocked and for what. Would you please consider removing the section header from the userpage warning? It would make vandal pages like this more readable (like this).

Someone made this change on the AntiVandalBot a while back. I hadn't realized that this was a separate bot. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix this during the weekend - thanks, Mart inp23 22:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing here?! R@y 19:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?? -- Tawker 22:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed :) Mart inp23 22:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headline text

no eatimg here tonight no eating here tonight..no eating here tonight you on a diet!!!♥ lmao —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.184.233.123 (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Bot couldn't handle other languages?

ok comon people this is what you do for a living... sad XD

Hi. Please see these edits. Perhaps you're aware of the problem already, but I just want to make sure. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 01:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Mart inp23 14:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MSN

Hey Martin, could you give me your MSN username? ta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.96.234.223 (talk) hey man give me yours and il add you kk? XD u there or what?

hi

hi how many facts do you know of? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steggie (talk • contribs) NO YOU GIVE M YOURS AND IL ADD YOU

His edit to Chevrolet Silverado has been undid by me.

Hi there. I think I undid the revision of his edit to the article Chevrolet Silverado. However, I actually used the "undo" function and it actually worked. Thank you! LegoAxiom1007 14:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Coach Terminal

I recently deleted the page Sydney Coach Terminal, its the page that I created. I was informed by another administraitor that my article was strange and that it was a no brainer. This was user User:Bduke. Also things are not to good at the terminal so I decided to get rid of it, I thought that if I created the article I could delete the artice and possibly come back with a better article later on . I will even make minor contibutions to other pages, but mainly hyperlinks to other pages. User:mindys12345

WHO CARES!!!! seriously nobody cares

A refreshing beverage

		A refreshing beverage
		A hard working bot deserves a refreshing glass of motor oil! —dgies^t_c 18:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Nitin Edit

It was purely spam if anything. Didn't adhere to Wiki's standards. I recommend someone more "human" look into it.

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me too many times in fighting for a better wikipedia (aka counter vandalism). Happy reverting, Snowolf ^(talk) _CON ^COI - 18:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mart inp23 19:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your constant reverts to blanked articles I hereby award you The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Lakers 23:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mart inp23 10:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William Tecumseh Sherman

Today's DYK featured article William Tecumseh Sherman is under massive attack! Needs immediate protection! -- Camptown 18:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Carly Patterson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kntrabssi 02:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

Why edit the word "fuck" to "f**k"? Seems like unneccessary political correctness. Legit non-vandalized on sexuality and slang would be impacted unless the bot avoids correcting these pages.--P Todd 03:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified people in Eygpt

Thanx...

Your bot was wrong

Comparison of hex editors. I undid your bot's adding of a deleted template and its replacement of up-to-date information. Althepal 18:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Catch

12:39, March 31, 2007 MartinBot (Talk | contribs) m (BOT - rv Chadwarden (talk) to last version by Necris)
(cur) (last) 12:39, March 31, 2007 Chadwarden (Talk | contribs) (←Replaced page with 'Hello, I'm martin bot and Im a fucking douche who trys to prevent chadwarden from editing and giving his opinion.')

Your edit to Lexist

I think the bot should be smart enough to recognize a merge. See Lexist for an example of an incorrect decision by the bot. Pascal.Tesson 18:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It usually spots redirects - sorry! Mart inp23 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal is active

See Spoke. Gregorydavid 21:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Seems like vandal has April Fool on the brain.Gregorydavid 21:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

Your bot marked one of my edits as vandalism for some reason. Perhaps you should "whitelist" admins from being reverted? Thanks, VegaDark 00:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most admins are whitelisted - the problems is that the automatic updating feature for admins has broken down, so we need to add new ones manually. For reference, it can be done in #vandalism-en-wp on freenode. Mart inp23 10:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recently tried to do some damage repair on an article about an English soccer player called Kevin Nolan, because it had been vandalised by some lame humour. And I got a message about ME vandalising it. How can I in the future report vandalism, without being blocked?

Taj Mahal edit

I think you were mistakened,I did not edit the article on the Taj Mahal as I only started to get on Wikipedia. ---76.203.73.222

Award of a Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		The Editor's Barnstar is hereby awarded for removal of vandalism above and beyond the call of duty. Addhoc 14:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the bot, thanks! Mart inp23 10:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Warning

Sock puppeteer Mrlob made that page of sockpuppets of Kermanshahi with his own sockpuppets in it to try getting away with his confession of beiing a sock puppeteer he is currently banned and made this under his new sockpuppet: MaoVerdonk I deleted it because I do not want these lies about me going around on Wikipedia and I will delete it again now I waould also recommend you to block MaoVerdonk. Kermanshahi 15:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I copied over the userboxes form AntiVandalBot and made a few changes. Hopefully that helps! Feel free to improve upon it if you want to. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 03:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Mart inp23 10:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karate Games

you should make karate computer games! that would be cool! and you could add cartoon characters that know karate! (spongebob, sandy, etc.)

Bad auto-revert

Please take a look at the history on Category:Directories. It appears MartinBot reverted what was a good action by an anon user trying to clean out spam left by a previous editor. --StuffOfInterest 19:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with reverting vandalism

Hello MartinBot, I've been reverting a lot of vandalism since I became a user here, and it's kind of hard at times thanks to frequent edit conflicts. My question is: Is there any way to make reverting vandalism faster? Brain40 ^{[talk] [contributions]} 19:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Brian40, Many users on WIkipedia are able to revert vandalism fast because of semi-automated tools or programs. Some of the ones I use are TWINKLE & Vandalproof. By the way MartinBot is a robot so it can't respond back to your queries but it is good at reverting vandalism fast. Hope this answers your questions. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 02:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello how are you?

sorry about the lord voldermort vandalism forgive me plz(King food 13:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry!

I left for a sec to get something to eat and my sister started doing random vandalization. Doody 09 05:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stalingrad Madonna

Hi MartinBot, the Stalingrad Madonna page, which I just created, has been removed by me so that I may write it properly, and cite sources correctly. Cheers.--RobNS 19:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ediacaran biota

Hi, your bot reverted this edit at Ediacaran biota. As I mentioned in my edit summary, I was converting the dates to ISO format to comply with the Template:Cite journal (and the other Cite templates), so they wouldn't be rendered as red links.

I don't revert back when I've been reverted, so please fix the article. | Pat 15:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ghostfreak returns

Don't worry i deleted it the other day, much to my dismay! anyway Ghostfreak returned and it was awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

re: Captain Obvious

It looks like the bot and I tried to fix the same vandalism... and the bot put it back. — J Greb 07:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romeo and Juliet

My edit to Romeo and Juliet was real. See "Unexpected Reversion" at talk. AndyJones 08:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Fiji

I added the merged tribe name next to each contestant's name, and the bot reverted it. Jordan 01:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot's incomplete reversion

In the article Stock market crash, MartinBot correctly identified vandalism. However, that vandal had made an uninterrupted series of vandal attacks. Never mind my comment in the history log. In fact, the reversion was an improvement: It was just complicated by the diff function making me think it had deleted content. Would it be hard for MartinBot to look through all contiguous edits by the same identified vandal and do a bulk revert? —EncMstr 21:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic in KH.

It's a hoax. Delete that page now. 76.183.100.70 22:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MartinBot also works FOR vandals

Problem: Vindictive users creating maliscious pages for the harassment of others: Legitimate person related to such information goes to blank the page and MartinBot restores it, leaving WikiPedia as a source of harassment. Improvement needed.

Definitely agree. Would like to see improvement in this matter as it leaves incorrect (and sometimes malicious) content on wikipedia that is a clear deviation from wikipedia policy. Check out Category:Indian photographers. Only thanks to DarkFallswas the Bot's reversion re-reverted.

-Deepraj | Talk 13:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page shouldn't be touched by this bot

Hey, can you set up this bot to not go near Wikipedia:Requested templates/Uncategorized - I often blank that page so I can remove the "uncategorized" templates to categorized areas - and I've been reverted by various bots a few times. Appreciate it.danielfolsom© 20:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks Mart inp23 14:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange revert

MartinBot did a strange revert here. I undid it. --MoRsE 13:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very strange... - I think something strange happened when it got edit conflicted during the few seconds that edit conflicts can cause faults like this. Thanks, Mart inp23 14:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who's bot is reverting my legitimate edits?

Someone or something is reveting my Doris Day edits, but the editor has no username, just an ip address. And yet, I'm getting messages signed by MartinBot. What's going on? Leon7 20:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting an Error

bot - you messed up by reverting my reversion. in effect, you vandalized this page. please remove the notice from my talk page. thanks bot. the_undertow ^talk 02:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Bot is censoring

clockers This bot just reversed my uncensoring of an article. Fix this bot. 74.139.197.26 06:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second this. Someone made an edit to List of Gears of War characters and adversaries that inappropriately censored several curse words in a character's quote, and I edited them back to the original version. MartinBot interpreted this as vandalism and reverted it to the incorrectly censored version. Peptuck 23:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the bot does this, simply revert it. It is rare for it to make mistakes like this, relative to its number of edits, and the algorithm at the moment is quite finetuned. I will take a look at the particular example above and see if anything can be done Mart inp23 00:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not reverting far enough back

In the Thomas Edison article, this bot did a revert [9] which went from extreme vandalism back to less extreme vandalism [10], in which an IP address editor gave a total of 1033 rather than 1093 for the total number of patents. Subsequent human vandal reverters went back to the Martinbot version. In this way subtle vandals can do a slight change in the article followed by a gross blanking and their crap stays. This article is pretty well human patrolled, and reverting automatically to a vandalized version is a bad practice. Every day some vandals change one number or one letter to see if the change gets noticed, and this bot apparently cannot detect those changes. Thanks. Edison 16:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism

Can you teach to revert vandalism as fast as you do? You are able to do it before I can even get to the article! I hope you can give me a trick in doing it as fast as you can. Thanks! 55555five55555 01:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<3

Glad to see you're back up and running. No amount of edit conflicts could ever dissuade my love for you, MartinBot! – Luna Santin (talk) 06:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

scared* MartinBot 11:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC) :P[reply]

Stronger Warnings for Blatant Vandals?

I'm very happy to see that you're out there reverting vandalism and warning vandals. However, there are times when a blatant vandal needs more than your polite warning --- for a great example, look at Tj7788. In this case, it's a vandalism-only account that needed a final warning (so I added it after your polite warning), but many vandalism-fighters would decline to warn this user because you already warned them. I'd love it if there was a way you could assess whether this account has committed a lot of recent vandalism and give it a stronger warning, but I imagine that's technically very tough to do with a bot. Is this an issue you've considered? Thanks for your good work. Rickterp 15:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If they're blatant, block 'em, no sense warning when it's obvious that they won't stop. -- Tawker 17:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot undid vandalism removal

Just a few minutes ago, I tagged the page ‎Pambrun, Saskatchewan (now deleted) as vandalism and removed the ~1.6 megabytes worth of "FUCK FUCK FUCK" the author had added to the page immediately beforehand, and your bot reverted it. You should probably add a threshold for the maximum size reduction that will trigger a revert-and-warn (since there is NO legitimate reason why a page should ever get as big as that one did). --Quietust 21:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen a few but you have a point there, I'm actually thinking tweaking stuff for tagging for speedy would help a fair bit, thats on the if I ever get time list -- Tawker 17:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Cheers to Martinbot and its developer, it is a tireless and greatly effective vandal-fighter, I do quite a bit of vandal fighting myself, and MB and I often cross pathes. The bot's forte seems to be reverting page blanks, on that it is blinding fast and a relentless patroller. Normally it has already found and corrected most vandalism before I can even get there. One glitch (?) I have noticed a few times though, it that it does not always consistently leave vandals warnings, for instance it corrected a page blank in the Ellen article a few minutes ago, but did not give the user (82.133.104.147) a warning notice on their talk page (I did though) Other than that though, seems to be doing a bang-up job, keep up the good work, as a former web developer and Java coder myself I can appreciate the amount of rule-development and coding that must have gone into a self-guiding program (or perhaps entity) that's so intelligent. Wikidenizen 13:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's normally edit conflicts causing that problem - fortunately it's quite a rare occurrence though :) Martinp23 11:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism???

User IP 82.133.104.147 is a hacker, attack my server (rome.hostgo.com) DDoS attack. Block this user access at Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.1.239.125 (talk) 20:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explain my vandalism? I am a native speaker of the language and I may not correct the untrue things written over there? I demand my last version to be made for the article: [[11]] Eeamoscopolecrushuva 15:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the bot reacted to you removing large sections of the article--VectorPotential^Talk 15:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Algae

line 95 Who added "Hey!!!" I did not! should not have required deletion - however OK (will look again().Osborne 08:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quest for Glory I

See User talk:Nardman1. Made a mistake with that handful of edits and I apologize; hopefully, these changes will be amended shortly. Cromag 20:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a drink...

		A Tasty Beverage
		A hard working bot deserves a refreshing glass of motor oil! Sit back, relax, and take a break. You're always beating me to the reverts! FireSpike 02:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

username problems

hello my username is bucs10 and i am trying to sign in but forgot my password do you know what to do about this problem--75.82.22.125 23:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC) (real username Bucs10) Can you just leave the answer here User talk:75.82.22.125[reply]

this bot is imperfect

This edit certainly shows the imperfections of this bot. The summary says "(BOT - rv 71.232.167.127 (talk) to last version by 24.34.80.87)", but in fact all of the edits by user:24.34.80.87 were clearly vandalism and remained intact. I've reverted to an earlier version. Michael Hardy 23:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muffin Man

The references section of Muffin Man shouldn't be talking about "kenny Rogers"... It looks like some of the vandalism was missed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.179.23.62 (talk) 02:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Your bot is restoring vandalism. You may want to fix that. Everyking 07:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a Barnstar!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For constantly annihilating vandalism from the face of Wikipedia, I present you with a barnstar. Just like everyone else has said, you always revert faster than we do. :) Havocrazy 06:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic bot

This machine reverted an edit of mine which I think is legitimate - I was altering Stylommatophora to a redirect to Slug. The former is a duplicate of the latter, but only a pale shadow in terms of content and it was getting out of date too. So I would like the edit to stand. Don't think the bot misbehaved though! GrahamBould 19:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uggh...

Some idiot got into my account agian...Invisible Noise 02:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nitrium

What happened? A few weeks ago, it was considered for deletion (not sure if a formal AfD or just tagged). It was a tiny stub then. I then re-wrote it and expanded it a lot. Now it has been blanked and redirected to an episode but none of the info has been put in the episode article. You or the bot revert it but it has been done again. What are your thoughts on reverting to a blank/diverted page? Is this an edit war starting? As a compromise, I think it's ok to have a "see (name of episode) article" in the Nitrium article but redirecting it and not using any of the nitrium article's text in the redirect seems improper.VK35 18:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Curses!

You're putting me out of business... Whiskey in the Jar 18:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect revert

This bot reverted my vandalism revert of David Brock. Er rab ee 02:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism message

I did not perform any edits to the Pietro Perugino page. I never heard of him until the MartinBot message flashed in. Tcisco 16:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no 'bot' indicator?

I thought that bot-generated edits were supposed to show up with a bold b; martinbot's do not. --moof 02:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not actually flagged as a bot – Gurch 14:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

My bad about deleteing Pratical jokes

Be careful

Please don't accuse anti vandal fighters of vandalism. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to South Park constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 14:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The irony in this is so thick you could cut it with a knife. Anyway, keep up the great work! --Luigi Maniac 14:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some strange revert when the previous update was an antivadalism edit :)

Just for notice : French Football Federation. I ve reverted it back to the correct version. --Dionysostom 05:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be a b in the edit summary?

I think the bot should have a little bold b before the edit in histories, watchlists, and recent changes. You know what I mean. The edit summary already sys BOT, but I'm not sure if the b should be there as well, instead, or not at all. I don't rellly mind; it's your call, Martin. Reywas92^Talk 20:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not actually flagged as a bot – Gurch 14:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And not flagged because, well, the bot isn't perfect, and it's a little more controversial/risky than most bot actions (w/ the potential for mistake) -- Tawker 20:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please help fix the vandalism on Will Beback's pages which has me confused but reverting to the vandal is unhelpful, SqueakBox 21:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please block

Someone is threatening to block me from editing for an ongoing editing war over the genre of Lamb of God (band) so therefore he is being a hypocrite, please block User: Inhumer from editing or prevent the blocking of me. Please visit my talk page. Skeeker 07:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I have been checking my Wiki' pages and didn't make any edits or vandalistic attacks. I am using an Internet cafe and made a post to help people uderstand that there are 4 computers here (India) and many people...so please get the facts straight before linking an IP to an individual. Thanks! 202.88.251.31 07:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are using a shared IP and you were not the one who vandalized, then I recomend you get an acount, that way only the edits you make will be linked to you. --Mschel 12:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

German University in Prague

There is the differnce between the universitys. there were tow different instituence.

Another complaint

You reverted my edit of Boca Ciega High School, inserting a huge pile of cruft into a (probably deletable) article. Please be careful when driving your bot. Thanks --Aim Here 17:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chinatown, Montreal only half-revert :-(

Chinatown, Montreal was only half reverted vandalism. If it looks like the bot fixed the vandalism, but it did not, other people may think it was solved and not look at the other edits... Fantasy 13:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pokénatzi says the only pokemon to get there owin page are the ones who don't evlove. Anubiz 17:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]