User talk:MarnetteD/archive40

Pundits

Good morning M.
Jonathan Davies & Tom Shanklin have commented on what I posted here yesterday: I am of the same opinion. Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 11:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the link G. Interesting read. I know there are many things to consider when putting a national side together but I did wonder how leaving off such veteran players might affect the rest of the team. Enjoy your weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 17:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

A test

Special:Contributions/Lolololol4567, to see if someone is watching. Don't change the Awdry article though, please, since those edits are actually correct. But the Mickey Rooney ones aren't and were reverted. We'll see if certain other articles get edited, doncha know.  :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 15:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

They turned up a bunch of sleepers this time. I feel honored now, since one of them was named this. His grasp of spelling continues to be a dead giveaway.  :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 17:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Good deal Ebyabe. If you don't mind I will move that page to "Ebyabe Rocks!!" Cheers MarnetteD|Talk 18:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Can you do that to a sock account? Oh, you're kidding. :) Thanks for the upbeat words, btw. I'm going through some... stuff right now, and I can use all the positivity I can get. Cheers!  :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 18:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hang in there Ebyabe. All the best to ya in the week ahead. MarnetteD|Talk 19:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

BBCA

That's cool! I was checking links and worrying about a source, and plumb forgot the italics. The DW phrasing is far better. I wasn't happy with mine, and figured you'd be along. Mille grazie!! --Drmargi (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks DM. MarnetteD|Talk 19:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Two BBCA devotees, and we overlooked the co-productions. Sigh... But we've got it now, with a bit of teamwork!--Drmargi (talk) 20:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Acting Like You Own An Article

I noticed in the past you would revert edits that you didn't like, such as ones that removed the phrase "popular and well-known TV show". Wikipedia is supposed to have Neutral Point Of View articles, saying "popular and well-known TV show" IS a personal opinion; without a reference to back it up it is considered a personal opinion. I don't mind removing the statement everytime you revert the edit, I saved the article to my USB drive anyway so if you revert a lot of edits that remove personal opinions I will just copy the article from my USB drive and paste it, since, once again, Wikipedia's articles are supposed to be Neutral Point Of View (please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view in order to understand this; if you do understand this then please demonstrate that you understand by accepting edits that remove statements such as "popular and well-known TV show". 209.202.109.146 (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Onel5969 for the removal. Since this is the second time this has been posted to my page I am going to restore it for a brief time as I have to point out to the IP that they are 100% wrong. I have never knowingly restored the words "popular" and/or "well known" to an article for TV shows or films or books or anything else because I fully understand WP:NPOV. In fact I remove "best known for" whenever I see it. As to the rest of the post it is mostly gibberish that has nothing to do with me. Perhaps you have me confused with someone else or perhaps this is just trolling. Whoever you are please try and get your facts right in the future. MarnetteD|Talk 15:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks, but to be fair, I was kind of taunting him a little. I should probably stop doing that. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. MarnetteD|Talk 20:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

CSI (Immortality)

MD, would you take a peek at the Production section of the article for Immortality (CSI)? Is it me, or is it getting really, really fancrufty? Gracie!! --Drmargi (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Crufty and excruciatingly boring Drmargi. The only thing missing is what they had for lunch. IMO the last bit - starting with "She is our queen" isn't encyclopedic. But that is just me and I suspect that those that entered it will insist on its staying. I wonder if it is going to be any good. The one time I saw one of these "lets bring everyone back for a wrap up of the story" that really worked was Homicide: The Movie. MarnetteD|Talk 01:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Glad it's not me. Most of it was added by an IP, so heaven knows where they're coming from. The "she's our queen" line is pure pandering to an ego, and frankly, the whole thing reads like the second coming of Helgenberger (who spent her last two or three seasons phoning in her performance, if you ask me.) I'll tweak it when I get a bit of time. --Drmargi (talk) 01:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

OK, I just took a good whack at cutting down the excess in the article. They also have listed the film as having two episodes, not realizing that it's shot so it can be broken into two episodes for later syndication. That should start a small war, I daresay. Meanwhile, i found three sentence worth keeping in the production section. Someone with a love affair with Twitter fancruft won't be pleased, I fear. --Drmargi (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Rashomon

Could you provide a 3rd opinion on gazprompt's latest change in the lead? Personally I think the original formulation is still the most appropriate, but I don't he will listen to an argument just by me.

So an uninvolved 3rd opinion might settle the issue either way. So whether we should keep the original version ([1]) or the current one by gazprompt ([2]).

regards,

--Kmhkmh (talk) 02:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Since I pinged you with my comment on the talk page you will know that I have added my thoughts about the situation Kmhkmh. If you need wider input you can leave a message requesting such at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Thanks for your efforts in this. MarnetteD|Talk 03:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, let's hope that settles the issue though.--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Watching ...

Courtesy of my LOVEFiLM subscription, I am currently watching The Killing (Danish TV series), Series One. It is excellent. Have you seen it?
There was an American remake; was that good? Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

I have not seen either version G. If the Danish one ever airs here it will likely be on the this station so I will be on the lookout for it. They recently aired the third series of Blood of the Vine which I really enjoy. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 14:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

I have never heard of Blood of the Vine and having the redlink is odd. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 17:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

We don't have an article by its French title Le sang de la vigne either G. Here is a nice recap of the series. Thankfully we do have an article for its star Pierre Arditi. Along with the intricate murder mysteries I get to learn all sorts of things about wines and how they are produced. The season 2 episode "Golden Wedding in Sauternes" has an extraordinarily wonderful performance by Dominique Pinon. Another joy is the scenery of various vineyards all over France - the third season episode "The Mystery of the Yellow Wine" is filmed in the Jura (department) and has a scene at a restaurant with an outdoor dining area that has a gorgeous set of waterfalls in the background. If it is available to you I think you might like it. MarnetteD|Talk 18:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Blood of the Vine is not available on LOVEFiLM, but Amazon.co.uk have Series 1 and 2 available to buy ... Something for the future(?) p'haps. Your description is mouth-watering. Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 08:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

I have been purchasing the DVDs of each season G. If they fit into your budget I think you will like having them in your collection. Enjoy your weekend! MarnetteD|Talk 19:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Mahallebi

That's because I removed a self-published book. I've suggested a good source on the talk page but due to edit warring I thought I'd wait to add it. Doug Weller (talk) 16:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification Doug Weller. I had noticed your post and figured out some of what your intentions were. You might get a chuckle out of my post here though I know my sense of humor can elicit groans as well. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 16:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Very good, I did get a chuckle out of it. Doug Weller (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

My life may have just gotten more interesting...

User talk:Doniago#Adminship - Someone's made a horrible, horrible mistake. :p DonIago (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Yowza Doniago. Running the RFA gauntlet can be tough but I think you are an asset to WikiP and this would increase that. I wish you well whatever happens. Cheers MarnetteD|Talk 15:05, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Hide me. :p I was genuinely shocked surprised that someone wanted to nominate me. And, obviously, quite flattered. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

I held out for over a year after it was first suggested that I run. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Evidently I had far too much free time on my hands at the precise moment when I was approached. You win again, Boredom!!! :( DonIago (talk) 18:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Ripper Street, Series 3

Dr Margi and M. You both wrote earlier, just before the BBC began showing it, praising this series. I agree; it is better than the first two. I am still reeling from last night's episode 4. Fantastic viewing.
Hope you both have a great Sunday! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 17:31, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Gareth, the move to Amazon is the best thing that could have happened to that show. I think I mentioned earlier: Amazon put some money into the show, and it's all on the screen. The first to last episode is what we in the U.S. call a "bottle" episode, done largely one one standing set. It's a meditation on one character, and really different from what they've done in the past. Can't wait to hear what you think. Season 4 just began production, and the list of guest cast is amazing. --Drmargi (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Did they have fingerprinting in those days? If so, it would be clear that the man closest to each gun couldn't have fired it. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

I am afraid this is a bit of a River Song "spoilers" situation R but much will be revealed in the next four weeks. Gareth I thought the blending of the individual episode stories with the eight episode story arc was/is very well done. Cheers to everyone!! MarnetteD|Talk 18:54, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

I understand it was primitive, but a lot of early forensics, and the need to do crime scene investigation, began in that era, and evidently owes some of its origins to Sherlock Holmes, believe it or not. --Drmargi (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Ah, the different kinds of cigar ash. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I have read that as well DM. Though I do think that it is a bit unfair that Sherlock's predecessor C. Auguste Dupin is often forgotten in regards to this :-) MarnetteD|Talk 19:25, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

From what I understand, Conan-Doyle and his mentor, Bell, were aware of some of this work, as well a some going on in the US, and by working them into the book. along with what Bell himself was doing, Conan-Doyle made it appealing enough for other police to give these new methods a try. Where have we seen that before? --Drmargi (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Well DM in 1973 a certain Sam Tyler introduced the Manchester constabulary to all sorts of modern forensic methods :-) MarnetteD|Talk 03:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

BBC America

Do you have any magic spray alongside the Troll-Be-Gone that will deal with an IP who can't tell William Shatner from Patrick Stewart? Sigh... --Drmargi (talk) 07:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

It is weird Drmargi. FYI NielN is aware of the situation and I have been reporting each new IP here User talk:NeilN#Blocked IP. Feel free to add to the list. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 14:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Easy. One's British playing American, the other's Canadian playing French. No, other way around. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Something like that... Either way, NeilN seems to have slowed them down for the moment. Next time, I'll request page protection for a bit. --Drmargi (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

One more try

You have asked me in the past to no longer post to your talk page, and I have honored that request. That said, I am attempting to make amends with those whom I have had clashed in the past and for what I cannot even remember the clashes were in regard to. While I have always wanted to work with other Wikipedians as collegially as possible, things happen, stuff gets said, tempers flare, and sometimes it looks like turning back the clock is impossible. I have always respected your editing and your comments, even if I disagree with what you have to say or why you feel a particular edit is the correct one. To make a long story short, this is me holding out an olive branch and hoping you will accept it. Like I said, I don't even remember what we clashed on or why -- and that tells me that I have let whatever it was that made us Wiki-enemies go. My hope is that you can do the same and we can move on from here. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate the time and effort you put in to leave this message Winkelvi. Unfortunately, you are under a misconception when you use the phrase "Wiki-enemies" as I do not view editing here in terms like that. I can appreciate you efforts on various articles as well as your instincts regarding sockpuppets. After that anything else I would say is likely to cause offense. I understand that things are different for you but I do not always have the time or the energy to deal with that fact - yes that is my failure. Thus, while I appreciate your offer and the sentiments behind it, I would ask that you go back to honoring my request to not post here. This message may be upsetting to read and I apologize for that. MarnetteD|Talk 03:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For removing the protection icons from articles where protection has expired. Day after day, week after week, by hand. Your hard work in this minor but important matter is much appreciated. (P.S. I wonder if someone can write a bot to do this? Because you do lots of other, more interesting stuff here too.) MelanieN (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for this barnstar MelanieN it is much appreciated. One of the bots (though I don't remember which one) does remove most of the expired protection templates but it does miss a few. Most of them are recent but I have seen ones more than two months old. here is a previous conversation about this that will have some info for you. I don't mind doing it since it is a perfect task for a wikignome like myself. Thank you again and have a delightful weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 17:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@MelanieN: see User talk:Redrose64#Removing protection icons, User talk:Redrose64#Your expertise is needed and User talk:Redrose64#When you have a moment. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Well, thank you too, Redrose! I just seem to mostly see Marnette doing it (maybe the articles I protect are the ones that need a wikignome to deal with?) but it's good to know there are two of you on top of this stuff. --MelanieN (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

I've been at it ever since one of the bots went down and never properly restarted - two years or more. But rather than monitor continuously, I have tended to check back every month or so and do a big run like this. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:38, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

FF2

Good, they're blocked. That was fast. :) Now back to watching this guy. If you thought it was difficult getting through to FF2, that's almost minor compared to this'n.  :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 23:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Hah our messages crossed each other Ebyabe :-) As to the other all I can say is ouch. MarnetteD|Talk 23:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Not long now

Hi M!
Decisive win in Dublin [3].
Hope you are enjoying your weekend too! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the link Gareth Griffith-Jones. I know it can be a mistake to read too much into these tune up friendlies but a win against the current Six Nations champ in Dublin is an encouraging sign! Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 16:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Wales are currently fifth in the international table.
And, there is still room for the "little guy" [4]—interesting addition to the squad — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 12:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

please protect America's Next Top Model (cycle 22)

Hi Marnette, will you please reinstitute protection of the ANTM 22 page? The page protection just ended a few hours ago and the vandals are going crazy on there already. I ask (again) that it be considered for protection until the end of the finale - not just 3 days. But, if we have to protect it three days at a time for the next two months, so be it. Thanks SchoolMarm101 (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The simplest solution is to go to WP:RFPP and request page protection. An admin should respond fairly quickly. --Drmargi (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting S know how to proceed Drmargi. SchoolMarm101 when you file your request make sure to note how many times the article has been protected in the last few months. That might lead the admin who responds to protect it for a longer period of time. MarnetteD|Talk 17:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

No problem. The vandalism is readily apparent. SM it will be helpful if you know how to do this. --Drmargi (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

@Drmargi: re this - do you edit from a mobile device with predictive text? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Occasionally. The Mac OS also has a rather aggressive spell checker. I try to catch the changes to what I intend to write (often shouting, "Don't decide you know better than I do what I want to say!"), but sometimes they happen as I post. It's very annoying. --Drmargi (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Jay Ward Productions and Hoppity Hopper articles has incorrect year dates

Why does everyone keep changing the year dates back to the incorrect ones? (examples: 1. Hoppity Hopper began in 1964 and ended in 1967, not 1961-1966 regarding the Jay Ward Productions article and certainly not 1961-1975 regarding the Hoppity Hopper article; and 2. Fractured Flickers first aired in 1963, not 1962.) I just found out that Jay Ward was only involved with Crusader Rabbit during the B&W episodes from 1950-1952. My other question is why does the Jay Ward Productions article list the live-action and/or hand drawn/CGI films and shorts based on its works if Jay Ward Productions didn't make them? (the films were made by Management Company Entertainment Group, Disney, Mandeville Films, Avnet/Kerner Productions, Universal Studios, Davis Entertainment, Joseph Singer Entertainment, Capella/KC Medien, Tribeca Productions, Wild Brain Productions, Kerner Entertainment Company, and DreamWorks Animation, and the Fractured Fairy Tales theatrical short The Phox, The Box, and The Lox was made by Universal Cartoon Studios/Universal Animation Studios) 24.180.56.157 (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Also, how come on the list of cartoons produced by Jay Ward Productions section keeps removing the episode of The New 3 Stooges entitled "That Little Old Bomb Maker"? Cambria Productions contracted the episode to Jay Ward Productions. 24.180.56.157 (talk) 23:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

The reason is the you have not provided any reliable source when you make your edits. Per WP:BURDEN and edits that you make must come with verifiable sources. MarnetteD|Talk 23:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Question about the StarToons article

Why did you remove the mention of StarToons doing a few scenes in one episode of Tiny Toons animated by Encore Cartoons? 24.180.56.157 (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

The reason is the you did not provide a reliable source when you made the change. Per WP:BURDEN and edits that you make must come with verifiable sources. MarnetteD|Talk 23:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Question about List of Dr. Seuss specials article

Why did you revert it back to the previous one? 24.180.56.157 (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

As above you did not provide any explanation or sourcing for your changes. MarnetteD|Talk 17:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Fantasia

Hey! "Great minds ..." Thanks for the kind words. Guess now I'll have to go find a slice of cheescake! Best, Markhh (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Twitter

I got an email (dated Sept 3, yeah I'm great about checking on that stuff) saying that my "Wikipedia p***ing contest" (I don't curse here) with Cvanderdonk has resulted in me being called out on Twitter by a movie star. Since van der Donk is not one, I assume it's D'Onofrio? I did some searching on Twitter and could find nothing to that effect. If true, I am thoroughly amused. If not, trying to scare me is so not working. Haven't heard anything on that front for a while. Oh wel, la-la-la.  :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 23:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Apparently it's these tweets - [5] and [6]. Again, could not care less, or be amused more.  :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 23:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Thanks for the info Ebyabe. Maybe whoever it is isn't as big a "star" as they thought they were :-). You sure do have the right attitude about it. I don't know if it is available to you but if you ever get a chance to see The Coca-Cola Kid I think you would find it amusing. Scacchi is gorgeous and there is jingle for selling Coke that is far superior to any that the real company has ever used in any of their commercials. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 23:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

OK we had an EC. I will check out the tweet after I save this. MarnetteD|Talk 23:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

No actor (or other person for that matter) has ever tried to rewrite their past have they? It could even be that vdD is jealous and is trying to change history. I think that is why WP:SECONDARY is important. For several years (though not recently) someone (maybe her) has been trying to make Kim Thomson younger than she is. Cheers again. MarnetteD|Talk 23:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

I forgot to finish my thought - it is good that you found the tweets since you will be able to point to them should the editing get out of hand on the article. MarnetteD|Talk 23:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

It's just odd that the email apparently came from a user who hasn't done any editing her for five years. I also find it amusing to see people's complete lack of understanding of Wikipedia. If ignorance is bliss, there are a lot of ecstatic people in the world. Or as I like to say, when did common sense become an oxymoron? Cheers. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 05:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Over the years I've had a couple emails from accounts that have never edited here. It is another thing that trolls do. As to common sense - I fear it went out of the species before out ancestors encountered the monolith in the Great Rift Valley :-( Enjoy your week!! MarnetteD|Talk 12:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Rajeev Jain (Cinematographer)

Hello MarnetteD,

Sir, I shall appreciate, if you remove Category:Indian choreographers and Category:Indian film choreographers ( Rajeev is cinematographer not choreographer) instead I shall be very happy that if you put my article on these categories:

Regards, VishwanathanNair (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your message VishwanathanNair. I have to tell you that I have no real interest in editing the article. You are free to edit the article (as you have done in the past) in line with WikiP's policies and guidelines. Especially note WP:CATDEF that states that any categories added to the article must have sourced info in the article to support them and be a defining characteristic of the person. I wish you well in your editing. MarnetteD|Talk 14:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Olympics - closed by

I see that you have been removing the "... closed by" parameter from a number of Olyympic articles. You may be able to answer the point which I raised last month at Template talk:Infobox Olympic games#Closed by. - David Biddulph (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the message David Biddulph. I posted my thoughts to the thread. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 14:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Please let me handle the vandalism

I keep getting edit conflicted. Are you an admin? If you are please block them. Krett12 (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Krett12. No I am not an admin but each member of this rather large drawer of socks gets blocked in fairly short order. Thanks for your efforts in dealing with them. MarnetteD|Talk 16:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

They're back!

Hello MarnetteD, Sorry to report that our "rape addict" has surfaced again on The Searchers Talk page and Chato's Land, this time using IP 109.151.68.104. This person is seriously disturbed. I will inform Ponyo for action. Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the note and your efforts David J Johnson. IMO it is a mistake to engage this person on any talk page that they have edited. Their twisted views should not be given a forum. That is why I remove those posts when I see them. I know that many editors are unaware of the situation and others would disagree with me. I can understand that I just wanted to mention this so you will know why I take the actions that I do. Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 22:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello MarnetteD, regret to inform you that the NI "rape addict"v is at it again - trying to re-instate the collapse that Ponyo made on The Searchers Talk page. I have reverted and informed Ponyo of this block evasion. Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the update David J Johnson. Looks like P has already shut this one down. I hope that you have a delightful weekend in spite of this. MarnetteD|Talk 17:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you MarnetteD, Susie is getting the wine out to calm me down - yet again!!! Best, David, David J Johnson (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hong Kong films

Lately, I've struggled a bit with burnout in HK films, and when I've been there, I've worked more on writing plots than fighting vandalism. I wanted to 1) thank you for all your efforts to clean them up and 2) apologize for not being as active there. I know firsthand how frustrating and tedious it can be to track and revert this HK vandal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your note NinjaRobotPirate. You are welcome and no apologies necessary. You are so right about the tedium that develops in dealing with someone who doesn't get it - especially as the months turn into years. IMO it is important to remember that we are all volunteers and it is better for your editing health to work on the things that you "want" to rather than "have" to. Your efforts, wherever they occur, are much appreciated. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 18:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Another Thanks

Thanks for watchlisting that stallion article; I'm kind of busy right now with this and not in a position to do much that requires vandal-chasing. I was wondering if we can get permanent semi on that article, seems the minute semi goes off the trolls return. Your thoughts? Montanabw^(talk) 03:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Montanabw. Actually my edit came about as I do Wikignome work with this Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates. After I read this post I added the article to my watchlist and will be happy to help with dealing with problem edits. Based on my experience with RFPPs (which is somewhat limited as I don't file reports there regularly) it will be up to the admin who sees it to decide about permanent protection and, since the bar is higher for that kind of protection, it can be hit or miss as to whether it gets applied. Here are a couple suggestions that might help - 1) give detailed examples of the vandalism and the frequency of its happening. In other words make the report more like a 3RR or an SPI - within reason that is - you know that "walls of text" always cause eyes to glaze over. I know that doing that can be time consuming but I find that it helps admins when you can give examples and the appreciate not having to search for them on their own. 2) Go directly to either (or both) of the admins who protected it this month - they will be familiar with the problem and sympathetic to the situation. I know you have been here a long time so you may already know all of this and I apologize if my droning on causes offense. I hope that you enjoy your weekend and good luck with the AFD. MarnetteD|Talk 04:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks and no worries, advice is always good. I've had luck getting articles with permanent semi in the past, I was actually surprised this one wasn't. Mostly I just don't have the time to do much that's complicate until the end of next week. Yeah, I'm going to have to be careful to enjoy my weekend and stay off wiki - that RfA is a real magnet, though for the most part, I've mostly been pleasantly surprised at how many people have been kind and supportive (most of the opposes from folks that I knew already weren't surprises. A couple disappointments, but they come by their views honestly). But autumn in Montana is beautiful - and fleeting - so I'd best try to enjoy it while I can! Montanabw^(talk) 04:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Speaking of ...

I just found out about this: Down on Abby. -- Softlavender (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

That is a hoot Softlavender. I don't think there is any film or TV show that the porn industry hasn't parodied :-) Did Fleming title his short story Octopussy to get ahead of that? HeeHee MarnetteD|Talk 17:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Seven Samurai: attitude sends this right to the dustbin of history ...

Your latest edit summary made me smile, and so I'll send you this. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 17:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the song G. Whoowee that takes me back. I danced to it a time or three in my college days. Cheers and congrats to the team for its performance against Uruguay. MarnetteD|Talk 18:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I just came across this on Facebook. Danger: advertising. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the link R. I hope that lots and lots of Americans read it and take the chance to watch the sport. Now if we could just get US announcers to understand what a scrum is. They usually use it (in US football) to describe a free-for-all mass of players scrambling for the ball when, in fact, it is a controlled situation with some strategy involved. I hope that you and Gareth are enjoying the matches. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 04:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Admittedly I have not watched a U.S. football game in about 20 years, but I've never heard announcers of that sport use the word "scrum". Are we sure we are not talking about scrimmage, when it comes to U.S. football? If not, when did "scrum" creep in? (I now notice that the lede of the article "scrum" says "Starting play from the line of scrimmage in gridiron football is derived from the scrum." And the article on scrimmage has a See Also called "Scrummage".) Softlavender (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Scotland breath a sigh of relief. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 09:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Rapid response from our good friend overseas. Did you not approve!? — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 09:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

[[User:|Softlavender]] if you haven't watched a game in 20 years I am not sure how you know what is being said today. My ears work okay so I do know the difference between scrum and scrimmage. Both in-game announcers and those showing the highlights of a games have used the word (often when there is a mad scramble to recover a fumble) and, while the word isn't used on a regular basis, trust me it is used and I was pointing out that its usage is incorrect. Thanks for the link Gareth. Cheers to you both. MarnetteD|Talk 13:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Reverting my editing in Orange and Lemons , The Camerawalls , Mcoy Fundales

My pages is my pages! Dont edit my pages! Because you ! I editing my pages! McoyFundales1977 (talk) 00:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

You will want to read WP:COI as well as WP:OWN MarnetteD|Talk 00:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Ah well the inevitable block ensued. Reading the links provided so rarely occurs. MarnetteD|Talk 14:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Foot fetishism

Borcker's socks are at it again. GAB^Hello! 13:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the note GAB. It looks like several admins are aware of this and at least one of the articles is protected. Should this person show up again feel free to report them to any of them. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 04:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Survivor episodes

I'm sorry for what I've messed up, Survivor: Cambodia aired in the United States, it's indeed correct. ApprenticeFan ^work 03:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

That is fine. As long as you get it fixed properly then all is well. Thanks for your note. MarnetteD|Talk 04:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:S2a3 name

This is the first template I have created. Thank you for your help in fixing the error which I made. I basically did a copy and paste from the npg name template. The S2a3 name template does exactly what I want it to do. I do hope that some other wikipedians with an intrerest in South African scientists find it useful. Wayne Jayes (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Request

Can you email me or turn on your email? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I've turned it on NeilN. MarnetteD|Talk 14:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

FYI Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Recent_change_to_how_timestamps_are_shown_in_protection_logs. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Prods

Hi MarnetteD,

WP:PROD is very clear that prods cannot be restored once removed. Please stop trying to restore contested prods. A reason does not need to be given for a prod to be removed. Once it is removed, the article can still be deleted, but an WP:AFD discussion is required. Please start an AFD discussion for those Beyblade articles if you think they should be deleted. Calathan (talk) 17:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your note Calathan. That is fine. Thanks for taking the time to let me know. MarnetteD|Talk 17:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)