User talk:Marlodge

Disambiguation

How do I create an entry with the same name as another, so that it appears on a disambiguation page? Victor Canning used the pen name Alan Gould, and I would like to make a page for that name. However, there is a Canadian poet called Alan Gould with an extensive entry already.

The most common way to do this is by appending the profession of the other person to the entry name. For example, for the situation above, you could create a new entry such as [[Alan Gould (author)]]. Then at the top of the main Alan Gould article, you could place a small tag, indicating that there is another Alan Gould that readers may be searching for. For example, you could use:

{{otheruses4|an Australian poet|the works of Victor Canning under the pseudonym of Alan Gould|Alan Gould (author)}}

which would render as:

But creating a disambiguation page is another matter, and it doesn't happen automatically. If you want to know how to do this, see this Wikipedia page.

More advice:

Sign your posts (but not edits to articles), even on your own talk page, with 4 tildes (~~~~). The Wikipedia software automagically adds your name and a timestamp when you do that. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 12:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vanishing Point (novel)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vanishing Point (novel), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wordscape/canning/vanishing.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 21:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simeon Suggs

The article Simeon Suggs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This literary character doesn't seem to have received any attention outside the works of Kemelman. Not notable at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simeon Suggs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simeon Suggs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simeon Suggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Maurice Scott (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are many points which are not supported by citations. I'd suggest adding more citations. It's hard to comment on the notability without more references supporting the points

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Maurice Scott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Marlodge, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yashovardhan (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Maurice Scott has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Maurice Scott. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Maurice Scott has been accepted

James Maurice Scott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 02:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Johns (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tim Johns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tim Johns, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Johns (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tim Johns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tim Johns, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Johns (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JC7V7DC5768 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References showing how he passes WP:Prof is lacking. Please provide better sources. If you still need to find the right sources, see the Reference desk.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tim Johns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tim Johns, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JC7V-talk 17:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tim Johns has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tim Johns. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Johns (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This is not written like a WP article but like a person tribute. Articles about academics have

1/ basic biographyi--brithplace, schooling, degrees, appointments, with years and dates. 2/ then a description of what he is best known for, referenced to good third party sources. Just describe. Omit phrases of praise, omit minor work, omit side issues. 3/Then a list of awards and honours, and pmajor professional service 4/Then a biography of books published, with references to published reviews. If there are any particularly important articles list them, with evidence of their importance, such as citation figures. Omit minor published work.

You have the material for part 2, if you remove details about organizations he founder , but never cite Wikipedia--just link to our article. You do not have to describe the topic if its described in the linked article.

Aim for conciseness. Replace most of the uses of his name with "He" or the equivalent.

I can help you with all this if you ask on my user talk page--academic biographies are my specialty here. DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tim Johns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tim Johns, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tim Johns

Hello, Marlodge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tim Johns".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greek fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Envoy Extraordinary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]