User talk:Marktemplin

Still a conflict of interest

Given your personal, albeit not paid, relationship, for sake of transparency, you should still declare COI on your User page. While doing that, can state that it is not paid. David notMD (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, David notMD. I will indeed add this stipulation to the Sandbox Talk page. Cheers. Marktemplin (talk) 03:46, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally there and on your User page. See mine as example of blanket COI explanation (recently amended to show now retired). For articles I was deeply involved with, also declared on article Talk page. David notMD (talk) 10:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Marktemplin! You created a thread called Writing an article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aerial Sports League (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's probably notable looking at some of the sources, but it's written far too promotionally for me to accept right now. It needs to read more like an encyclopaedia article than a blurb from the company's website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aerial Sports League and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aerial Sports League, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 05:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marktemplin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer T·C 05:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review round

Thank you, SportingFlyer. I am a friend and therefor a fan. Perhaps my enthusiasm encroaches a bit too far onto my pen. I endeavor to deliver a revision from an objective and neutral point-of-view as soon as possible. Cheers. Marktemplin (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aerial Sports League concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aerial Sports League, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aerial Sports League

Hello, Marktemplin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aerial Sports League".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]