User talk:Mark Mifsud

Welcome!

Hello, Mark Mifsud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Mifsud, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mark Mifsud! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Broadcast

Two things: firstly, an infobox is not allowed to stand alone as any article's only content. If you want the British company to have an article, then you need to actually write an article and not just an infobox. And secondly, no company is automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it exists — that article is going to need to cite real reliable sources to demonstrate that the company actually passes one or more of the inclusion criteria at WP:CORP. So until you can actually write a real article which actually meets both of those standards, the existing redirect to the company in Hong Kong stands.

And I obviously don't have any definitive proof that you're actually an employee or owner of the company in question — but if you are you need to familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest policies, so that you understand that you need to exercise extra caution not to violate our content and sourcing and neutral point of view rules in the process. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MetroProductionGroup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MetroProductionGroup, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Considering your direct conflict of interest you need to go through WP:AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MetroProductionGroup

Hello, Mark Mifsud. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MetroProductionGroup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Nuttall (May 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: My condolences to the family, but Wikipedia is not the place to post this. Maybe there are suitable obituary websites, but I don't know what to recommend you, I'm sorry.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]