User talk:Marius Kristiansen

Marius Kristiansen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Marius Kristiansen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Battle of Julin Bridge, from its old location at User:Marius Kristiansen/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Iflaq ^(talk) 23:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle at Julin Bridge has been accepted

Battle at Julin Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The battle of Jelling moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The battle of Jelling, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 17:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Schleswig moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Siege of Schleswig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 08:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Jellinge Heath moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Jellinge Heath, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Schleswig moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Siege of Schleswig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Hi — I've just moved two of your recently-created articles into the draft space. They've been previously deleted or draftified for lacking sufficient references; the way to deal with that is not to republish them, but to ensure that the references are adequate to support the article contents. A single source, cited one or only a few times, is not enough. Please do not move these to the mainspace, or recreate them again, before they are ready and properly supported. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by reliable independant sources. Nearly all we know of the Danish Civil war is from Saxo Grammaticus (the one i reference is a 1898 translation), so i think if you know of any other writer (who wrote during the war) whos acount is as detailed as his i would love to read it. His source is in my opinion the only one you would need.

The problem with single source is that anyone can write anything they want and get it published. The more sources there are (that at least broadly agree on the subject), the more likely the statements are to be reliable. This is pretty basic stuff, and I believe has been pointed out before. (And as for what "I mean" by reliable sources, please see WP:RS.)

Even if you do rely on a single source only, it needs to be cited wherever you're relying on it for verification. When there is a lot of content without citations, it's impossible for anyone to know whether the information comes from the source cited elsewhere, or is based on the editor's own original research (which is not allowed).

Finally, if you ping me with your replies, I'll know that you've responded; otherwise I don't.

Hope this helps. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Well i did reference him in both the siege of Schleswig and the battle of Jellinge heath. And i want to clarify this is not just a source this is the source on the danish civil war, and it is all written down around the same time, the book which i am referencing is from the 12 century (in Denmark). So the person who wrote this could not just get it published. I can cite more if you want, but all i am writing is practically citation, i read the text, translate it, compress it and then i write it down. The only thing i don't cite is the background part and the aftermath part as i thought one could just look at the main page were everything was relatively clear, but i can put citations there aswell i guess.

Battle of Sejrø moved to draftspace - unsourced

An article you recently created, Battle of Sejrø, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The battle at Dysiaa (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Battle of Dysiaa instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The battle at Dysiaa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The battle at Dysiaa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Antan O 03:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Siege of Schleswig (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 17:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Siege of Arkona has been accepted

The Siege of Arkona, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Antan O 05:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Danish Crusades

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Danish Crusades, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Danish Empire

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Danish Empire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Danish Crusades

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Danish Crusades".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Danish Empire

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Danish Empire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Sejrø

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Sejrø, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Schleswig

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Schleswig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Sejrø

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Sejrø".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Schleswig

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Schleswig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The battle at Dysiaa

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The battle at Dysiaa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The battle at Dysiaa

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The battle at Dysiaa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Second Siege of Schleswig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First Siege of Schleswig moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, First Siege of Schleswig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Siege of Schleswig

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Siege of Schleswig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]