User talk:Marianne Casamance
Hello Marianne. It's good to have someone editing who lives in southern France. I spend almost half the year in l'Hérault and have tried to create articles on the region. You recently made edits to Château d'Entrechaux and Château de Lacoste, changing the category Vaucluse to Châteaux in Vaucluse. In normal English use, the word château is applied to French palaces, stately homes, mansions etc and not to a castle (château fort). I have reverted your edits therefore, to avoid confusion. For a better explanation of the differences and the reasonings, see the heading of List of castles in France. Emeraude (talk) 13:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
There is a Category:Castles in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, and a category for every région in France. I think there are probably too few castles in Vaucluse for a separate category. Château de Lourmarin was originally a castle, so it should be categorised as a Castles in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur - I have done this. It later became a "stately home", so the château category is also correct. It was not listed with List of castles in France so I have added it there. Emeraude (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vinisud
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vinisud, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- To Vanjagenije : many thanks for your message. I contest this speedy deletion. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem with the article is WP:NOTABILITY. Without reliable sources to prove the notability, it will be regarded as a promotion. See WP:42. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Just a note to say that I have read the note you left, but I was nonetheless compelled to delete the article. As Vanja said, please read up on notability, and if you try again make sure that the article demonstrates notability, is neutral, and uses reliable sources. Preferably try creating a draft and using the WP:AFC process. Vanamonde (talk) 05:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem with the article is WP:NOTABILITY. Without reliable sources to prove the notability, it will be regarded as a promotion. See WP:42. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Verrerie de Trinquetaille
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. Marianne Casamance, thanks for creating Verrerie de Trinquetaille!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs more wikilinks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.