User talk:Marialopez pabon/sandbox

It is difficult to understand the concepts that you are trying to explain. In the "methods" section I see you are trying to explain the history of Mendel´s and further experiments. If you worked on the flow of the text, it would come together nicely. I suggest you check the grammar tenses. Do not forget to add references.

Tbento2015 (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)tbento215Tbento2015 (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very informative and I appreciate the separation of information into the subheadings. Remember to capitalize some of these headings like introduction. I agree that some of the flow of the text seems to be awkward, but could be easily fixed by some rearrangement. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewells2013 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few grammatical changes but I was somewhat limited to what I could do because I didn't understand the context of most of the writing. Also, try to add your sources as well. Ncameron2013 (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)NCameron2013[reply]

This is nice and simple writing. One suggestion is that if you are going to add more information on the techniques used in the study of classic genetics, I recommend that you mention the various features of the different methods, to allow comparisons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrarSoaad (talk • contribs) 00:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]