User talk:Marfboynoproxy

July 2015

Hello, I'm PotatoNinja. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Interstate 95 in Maine— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 12:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Interstate 95 in Maine with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 12:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Interstate 95 in Maine, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Interstate 95 in Maine was changed by Marfboynoproxy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904993 on 2015-07-10T12:53:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Interstate 95 in Maine. PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 12:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Something

Obviously you think I'm getting aggravated by your idiotic behavior, but I can revert anything you do at the click of a button with huggle. Essentially as soon commit these acts of vandalism I can just revert it straight away. Happy editing, -PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 12:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Coconuts31 (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]