Jump to content

User talk:Coconuts31

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Coconuts31, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Conifer (talk) 23:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my IP

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coconuts31 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Wikipedia thinks my IP address is a web host provider, even though it isn't. My contributions don't say I'm blocked just for hosting websites like http://cuddlesworks.wikia.com. Remember, this is only for my IP address. Coconuts31 (talk) 13:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Turn your VPN off then. You have, on a couple occasions, tried to use a webhost to edit. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Web host provider" in this case means "anonymising service". —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My second request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Coconuts31 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you are reading this, I have now turned off my VPN. Please unblock my IP address as soon as possible. Thank you. Coconuts31 (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Since you have edited articles since this request, turning off the VPN filter seems to work, so I am procedurally accepting this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you try editing now? I don't think you're blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 17:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It works. Coconuts31 (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Coconuts31! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:26, Friday, July 3, 2015 (UTC)

Did you read the instructions? If you nominate an article for TFA it must have achieved featured article status which Toontown Online most obviously has not. Nthep (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Coconuts31 (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So why did you think that the requirement "The article must be a featured article" wasn't applicable here? Nthep (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I checked the article. Nothing was wrong with it. Very well written, referenced, etc. Coconuts31 (talk) 14:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You obviously don't understand what featured article means. Featured articles have undergone thorough peer review and checking to ensure they are the accurate, neutral and everything can be verified. This article has not had that level of scrutiny or even been assessed as a good article. I notice that you haven't yet actually edited any articles. Can I suggest that you concentrate on improving articles and do not get involved in areas that you don't yet understand. Nthep (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TFARP

[edit]

Your request for TFA came a bit too early (says August 22, no?), but for long-term planning there is WP:TFARP. It also should be promoted first. Consider to remove the template yourself, and until you get there (a month before the date) you will have a link to the article and a blurb of 1200 characters, I assume. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning

[edit]

Please explain why you gave an only warning to this editor for creating an innocuous autobiography. --NeilN talk to me 18:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He created a page that doesn't comply enough to Wikipedia's Biographies of Living People policy. Coconuts31 (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's absolutely no reason to give an only warning. In fact, the speedy deletion notice given by another editor was enough. Please review WP:UWLEVELS and choose your warnings and warning levels a great deal more carefully. --NeilN talk to me 18:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Coconuts31! Thank you for your contributions. I am Coconuts31 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Coconuts31 (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

[edit]

Please do not edit archived pages. [1] Thank you. --NeilN talk to me 22:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN, I believe this was an admission by the sockmaster whose account is the accused in this section. An awkward attempt at Clean starting, I think. If either you or Ritchie333 (who unblocked above) would like to extend an offer, you are welcome to but I'm seeing several issues which lead me to think that they just don't get it, yet.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

Extra unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coconuts31 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Thank you. Coconuts31 (talk) 16:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)´[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that there was confirmed sockpuppetry this week, I rather doubt that. Huon (talk) 23:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This block appears to be Checkuser-based. Such blocks are generally not overturned. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]