User talk:MarcusGraly

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, MarcusGraly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --evrik 20:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks MarcusGraly 20:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongly deleted?

It looks like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherman Hall (University of California, Berkeley) was the reason for the deletion of Sherman Hall (University of California, Berkeley). What makes you say it was "wrongly deleted"? Normally this would be deleted as a recreation, but if there's some reason for it to stay, that's a possibility too. Friday (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment on Talk:University Students' Cooperative Association These articles should either be merged or kept, not deleted. So I was restoring the two that had already been deleted from google cache, so that they could be merged, if that's what people decide. MarcusGraly 18:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Err, so what's your end goal, turning them into redirects? This can be done at any time, without having a little sub-stub there first. I don't see any mergable content in there. Friday (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currently there is a separate page for each of the houses in the USCA. Someone objected that these pages aren't notable and proposed that all but two of them be merged into the main page. Before this happened, two of the pages had already been deleted for reasons of non notability. I felt that the deleted pages should be restored, until we agreed what to do with all of the House pages. admittedly the Sherman Page had very little content. However, the Lothlorien Hall page, which I also recreated, does have significant content, that I did not want to be lost, should someone choose to merge it into the main page. I also restored Sherman Hall (University of California, Berkeley) to be consistent. Currently it doesn't have any information of note in it, but perhaps some day some future editor may want to add the history or policies of the hall and if we want to keep pages for the coop houses and not merge them, then it should be there as a stub. MarcusGraly 18:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USCA house articles merger

Marcus - have you had a chance to look at my proposed draft of the USCA article with the house articles incorporated here? Pretty much everyone else I've discussed the merger with is in favor, so that we don't lose the house articles piecemeal to AfDs; if you're agreeable to the change, I'll start it today. Αργυριου (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good, Thanks. One suggestion might be to consolidate the links and references at the bottom, if you weren't planning to do so already. MarcusGraly 22:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MarcusGraly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MarcusGraly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MarcusGraly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Liberty and union, now and forever, one and inseparable" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liberty and union, now and forever, one and inseparable. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16#Liberty and union, now and forever, one and inseparable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. p b p 22:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lothlorien Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lothlorien Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lothlorien Hall (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]