User talk:Marcom146

February 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Marvin Compper, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adakiko,

it's myself, Marvin Compper, and the displayed private status is not true anymore. I'm separated and the divorce is ongoing. I want that too be either changed or added. If you could do so I would appreciate it. Thank you

ps: if you need verification of my identity I can send you a video that I prepared Marcom146 (talk) 09:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Marvin Compper. Thank you. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 12:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To verify the information I can send a video of myself. Marcom146 (talk) 12:52, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

just tell me where to Marcom146 (talk) 12:52, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read conflict of interest. Why are you deleting your son and wife / ex-wife? They never existed? Compper's marriage and history is on publicly available reliable sources (RS). Please feel free to add information on divorce with a citation. See referencing for beginners. Please note that Wikipedia goes by what RS state. wp:original research (OR), e.g. your own recollections or knowledge, are OR and are not considered RS. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please realize that you are wp:anonymous. Is there a newspaper article (foreign language sources are acceptable though English is preferred) that states Marvin Compper is divorced? If so please add the divorce with the source help:referencing for beginners. A source is required for wp:verifiability. Otherwise, Wikipedia is just a gossip tabloid. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can send you a video with me talking and showing my ID . Would that be enough? Marcom146 (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unpublished correspondence (letters, emails, private videos) are not accessible to the public and therefore cannot be used as a source of information for an article. Wikipedia's policy on verifiability demands that a reader should be able to verify the information in an article from a reliable, published source. If something cannot be verified, then it cannot exist on Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Marvin Compper shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Marvin Compper while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]