Jump to content

User talk:Marcodounis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Marcodounis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub ‎, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Infrastructure Hub (June 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Marcodounis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Global Infrastructure Hub, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started on the wrong foot

[edit]

Marcodunis, it seems you've gotten started on the wrong foot. Submitting this draft repeatedly is not going to change the reviewers' opinion. What you must do is understand the sorts of references needed to establish that an organization is notable, as Wikipedia uses that term.

I'm going to decline your draft again, since you have not added any notability references since it was last declined. I am also going to redirect the copy you made in your sandbox to point to the draft. Please follow the instructions given in the decline notice. You must provide notability references before submitting the draft again or your activity will be considered disruptive.

One way to get a reading on whether you have suitable notability references is to ask. The talk page of the draft, the articles for creation Help Desk and the IRC channel #en-wikipedia-help are all places where this can happen. I recommend AFCHD since that creates a record you can point to when you submit your draft that you have met the notability requirement.

After notability, another consideration is whether the draft is too promotional to be an encyclopedia article. But one step at a time....

Thank you for placing a COI notice on your user page. You could also place one on the talk page of the draft.

If you feel you are being picked on, please understand that WP's community standards have evolved from many years of discussions between the editors and are quite robust – but they are also subject to change. If you have feedback on how any of our standards or procedures are being handled, you have a voice. I recommend starting at either the Teahouse or the Village Pump. I realize that some of this is going to feel frustrating or excessively bureaucratic to newcomers. Any suggestions on how to make it less so would be welcome. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Infrastructure Hub (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You have submitted the draft without addressing the issues raised by the previous review.
----

The primary issue at hand is that the draft does not establish that the organization meets the criteria set out in WP:NORG. References that can do this must be independent of the organization and include in-depth coverage by a reporting organization with a reputation for fact-checking and journalistic ethics.

----

A secondary consideration is whether the language used in the submission is too promotional for use in an encyclopedia article. Be particularly wary of expressing the organization's goals and aspirations in Wikipedia's voice.

----
Please do not submit this draft again without adding notability references. If you need help determining whether a given reference is suitable, you are welcome to ask on the draft talk page, at the Articles for Creation Help Desk (recommended) or on the IRC channel.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did a Google search to see if I could find any examples of good notability references for you. Nearly everything I saw was just press blurbs containing something like "According to a report from the Global Information Hub", which are worthless for this purpose (not sufficiently independent). There were a few more that might have been good, but their unhappiness with my ad blocking meant that I would not read them. This one, although it appears to be a blog post rather than a normal publication, comes close to being the sort of article I would expect to see being used as a notability reference: it's independent and goes into at least a little depth about the organization and its importance. Try to find more that are at least this good and summarize what they say in your draft. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

You can use a copyrighted logo on Wikipedia, but not in a draft. Once the article is accepted, you can upload the logo to en-wiki (not Commons) with a non-free fair-use rationale. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 12:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Infrastructure Hub (August 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Seems to fail WP:ORGDEPTH, and the longstanding issue of the draft have still not been addressed
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of employment

[edit]

Your existing declaration of a conflict of interest, while appreciated, still falls short of the stricter and mandatory requirements for a paid editor. You appear to fall into this category. What follows is the standard boilerplate message for an undisclosed paid editor:

Information icon

Hello Marcodounis. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Marcodounis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Marcodounis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Marcodounis! You created a thread called Global Infrastructure hub at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 22:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marcodounis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for editing the page Global infrastructure hub. This page has been deleted despite being submitted for review. The post was not promotional in nature it was simply listing a company that exists because it was created by the G20 in 2014. The content on the page had been updated to remove all references to products or services and simply stated the facts with references from notable sources. Im now unable to retrieve the page as it was delete almost immediately, not allowing for it to be disputed. Marcodounis (talk) 04:41, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are going to need to go into more detail about your relationship to the organization you were writing about before an unblock can be considered. "Simply stating the facts" is considered a form of promotion on Wikipedia; Wikipedia articles must do more than merely tell about an organization, they must show how it is notable as an organization. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

- Athaenara can i please have the content from the deleted page Draft:Global Infrastructure Hub

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marcodounis&oldid=1043816613"