User talk:Marching On The Leeds

To all footie fans

If you think it makes me proud that Leeds had the worst ever title defence within a Premier League season, think again. The point is I am here to write an encyclopedia and there is no ignoring that 1992-93 WAS the Premiership, WE were defending champions of whatever the top tier was, and we finished 17th without winning away. But now we are BACK where we always belonged.

Leeds have the GREATEST fans in the whole of English football.

Marching On The Leeds (talk) 09:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Marching On The Leeds! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Elland Road faithful (talk) 09:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1992–93 FA Premier League, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mattythewhite Marching On The Leeds (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're wrong. I don't need reliable sources to remove details from an article that not only were not sourced themselves in the first place, but were not relevant to the subject title. Notts County's status as oldest team in league having frittered out 27 years after relegation from the season we are writing about has no place on the article. Otherwise, why not write more about Notts County's onward adventures? It's called WP:COATRACK. --Marching On The Leeds (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS It hasn't helped you reverting me TWICE and putting both times "unsourced" since one of the two was indeed you replacing information. As for the other one, here, although it looks unsourced, the info I added is actually contained in the source that was already on the article. OK. --Marching On The Leeds (talk) 18:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You added unsourced content in this edit. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1991–92 Football League, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Fulham F.C.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Marching On The Leeds

A tag has been placed on User:Marching On The Leeds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. stwalkerster (talk) 19:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]