User talk:Marcasella

Welcome

Hello, Marcasella, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NSH001 (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the belated addition of this boilerplate text, hope it helps. I've placed it at the top of your page for easy reference. --NSH001 (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Re the website http://www.populationparty.org.au/ which I have re-edited today 3 March 2014:

The URL no longer corresponds to this Party's new name, viz. the Sustainable Population Party.

I do not know how to fix this. Could some more experienced editor please transfer this webpage to a new URL corresponding to the Party's current name?

Thanks.Marcasella (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Dally Messenger III (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 17:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Marcasella, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dally Messenger III has been accepted

Dally Messenger III, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marcasella. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments at Talk:Emilia Lanier

Hi Marcasella,

Regarding your two recent posts to Talk:Emilia Lanier. You've placed these inside a topic headed "Shakespeare authorship" started in 2008, and which, I believe, refers to the Shakespeare Authorship Question. Unless you specifically intended to reply to the editor commenting in that section, it would be better to place your comments in a new section, with a heading that reflects the gist of your comments. That way we can keep threads of discussion organised and people will better notice your comments. Also, if your two comments are addressing separate issues, it would probably be a good idea to put each in their own section so that any discussions that follow are kept on topic.

If you would like assistance with moving the comments, or how to create new sections and so forth, please feel free to ask (I'd be happy to help). Also, if you reply to my message here you may wish to use the {{ping}} or {{re}} templates (they're aliases of each other and work the same) to make sure I get notified of the reply: {{re|xover}} → @Xover: [1]. This will generate a notification (in the little bell menu at the top of the page) for me; unlike a reply without it where i would have to notice it in my Watchlist (where I will certainly look for it, but where it's very easy to miss when you have a lot of pages on your watchlist). --Xover (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xover: Hi Xover. Yes i would appreciate advice on how to create new sections within that Talk page, and how to move my comments into it Marcasella (talk) 12:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For future comments, to create a new section on an article (or user) Talk page, you can usually find a button labelled "New Section" at the very top of the page (a little to the right of the "Read" and "Talk" buttons). When you press this you should get a page with two text fields: a single-line one for the topic (what the heading will be), and a bigger one for writing your comment in. If you do it that way your comments will go in their own section.

To move the existing comments to their own section, you can instead press the "Edit" button. This will give you a text field with the wikicode for the whole talk page. Here you can find your comments, cut them using your normal text editing shortcuts (typically Ctrl+C or Cmd-C), then scroll to the very bottom of the page to paste them. You can then add a heading to each or both of them by typing it in surrounded by double equals signs, like so: == My heading ==.

Note that there are some settings in the Preferences of your user account that may affect the details here. For instance, one setting changes the "New Section" button to read just "+" (to save space), and others may enable the "Visual Editor" (a rich text editor that makes editing Wikipedia more like using Microsoft Word rather than using formatting codes like ==) which will change whether you see text fields or not.

Apart from the obscurity of manual formatting codes, you should be able to figure a lot of it out by just guessing; and since all old versions are preserved, it's really easy to restore an old version if you make a mistake. Give it a try, and send me a "ping" if you run into trouble.

PS. Another tip: the convention on talk pages here is to use indentation to show that a comment is in reply to a previous one. You can use a colon (":") at the very beginning of a line to indent one level; two of them ("::") for the second, three (":::") for the third, and so on. It's not a big deal, but it helps keep discussions readable and easier to follow. --Xover (talk) 12:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xover: Many thanks Xover! Have done so. Marcasella (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Square brackets not producing the normal display.

At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crollalanza_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship

the first Note is displaying as

"Shakespeare, l'inglese di... Valtellina"

The coded version runs [http://www.laprovinciadisondrio.it/stories/Homepage/187911_storia_shakespeare_linglese_di..._valtellina/ "Shakespeare, l'inglese di... Valtellina"]

What am I doing wrong?

Actually, you showed the solution above: the first one is correct, the second has a newline character in it - hard to see if the text line-wraps at or near the same point. I fixed it for you. --NSH001 (talk) 09:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Marcasella (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare Authorship Question: Crollalanza's fitness

 Why should Crollalanza have needed a pen-name?

   Proximity1 (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)proximity1[reply]

Crollalanza's fitness for what?

Why did he need a pen name? The accounts of him vary in their explanations for his double change of name. This was from Michelangelo Florio to Guglielmo Crollalanza (i.e. a transfer to his mother's surname, with in some versions also a change of first name, said to be done before he reached England, and intended to throw the Inquisition off his trail) and then secondly from Collalanza to Shakespeare. I don't think any of the varying accounts of this nebulous person describe any of his names as a pen name. (Authors who use a pen name normally keep their own name in daily life). So the suggestion is that in England he both lived and wrote under the name of Shakespeare. But in Iuvara's version there seems to be only one change of name: he presumably arrived in England perhaps as Michelangelo Florio, joined his mother's kin in Stratford, who had already assimilated and anglicised their name to Shakespeare, and allegedly took on the name of a cousin called William who had died in childhood. I don't think it is suggested that he tried to conceal his Italian origins by changing his name. Marcasella (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marcasella. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marcasella. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to George Pell, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 12:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael T. Wright

Thank you so much for the fixup on Michael's page. I was probably responsible for the mis-identification, and I appreciate your closer look. I'm also grateful Michael is still with us. :) SkoreKeep (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smallpox Epidemics among Aborigines in Australia from 1789 to the 1860s: Uncertainties and Debates

Hello Marcasella,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Smallpox Epidemics among Aborigines in Australia from 1789 to the 1860s: Uncertainties and Debates, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at [[2]]. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 12:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren:Thanks for your work, Hughesdarren, and tactful remarks. I've placed a reply, which I think will appear on the Talks page there. Cheers. Marcasella (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Marcasella

Thank you for creating Smallpox Epidemics among Aborigines in Australia from 1789 to the 1860s: Uncertainties and Debates.

User:Jack Frost, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Marcasella, what a fascinating article! Thankyou for expanding Wikipedia's coverage of Aboriginal Australians with such a thoroughly researched work. At the moment it is very much written in the academic paper rather than encyclopaedic style; I've left a tag on the article, and it seems you're still working away at it. When you're done and think it might be helpful, let me know as either myself or another editor might have a crack at a copyedit? Thanks again!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Jack Frost}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Jack Frost (talk) 02:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Frost:

Thanks Jack Frost. I would appreciate that. It may take me half a week to get this page reshaped as a free-standing article. I will try in the process to make it less academic, and will then look forward to your comments. Marcasella (talk) 12:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Frost:

Re the Smallpox page's current state, and a comment on its Talks page:

Jack, I've done what I can to improve the article, and have explained its current state at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Smallpox_in_Australia#Removal_of_the_%E2%80%9CMultiple_Issues%E2%80%9D_notice?

The article itself is now at Smallpox_in_Australia I would appreciate your input.

Marcasella (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Smallpox in Australia

I have only had a very very brief glance at the revised and new articles, but on face value it looks like a lot of work well done. The only comment I might make at this point, and it is a minor one, is that some of the 'further information's looked a but repetitive? Aoziwe (talk) 09:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoziwe: Thanks. Well spotted. Will fix at History_wars#Controversy_over_smallpox_in_Australia. Marcasella (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than just remove some of the repetitions, it might mean you need more granular sections in the target arrticle? Aoziwe (talk) 22:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]