User talk:MarcAlanBerger
March 2023
[edit]
Hello, MarcAlanBerger. I noticed that your recent edit to Stack v Dowden added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Sumanuil thank you for helping me. I will try you uploading first and by that do you mean construct a page specifically for them and then link them to the Stack v Dowden page.? and then if befuddled as my experiences yesterday were comparable with my experiences with calculus, I will try asking asking someone to help, maybe like yourself for instance? The web page has a picture of Willesden green tube station instead of the crown court logo for some reason that I cannot understand.
- The images are digital scans that I made of Transfer deeds which were sold to me for seven pounds by the HM Land registry in paper format. To my understanding They don't have any copyright restriction on them that I can see and nor any sent with the correspondence to me. I presume that they were signed to be publicly available documents and the HM land registry individually charges seven pounds for them to make them available but it does not entirely make sense why they don't just upload them on the web and make them free. In this particular case the 2005 signatures are a mixture of married people and unmarried people and it is noticeable that the unmarried have stated that they are tenants in common but not signed the deed as a receipt of transfer which might relate to the signatures of Stack and Dowden on the 1993 trust for sale deed in which a fact of the case was that the House of Lords got so state the joint tenancy was in equal share when it would appear from the practices of the land registration that the signatures were specifically there for the survivorship clause and it is here that the privacy laws become public because unlike in marriage which recognises the government (and democracy through county council registration ) as a third party to the contract and with it full disclosure , it is not that obvious for people who have no marital status..... MarcAlanBerger (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)