User talk:Mapmark

Welcome!

Howdy, Mapmark, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
Find everything in the Directory.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Introduce yourself at the new user log.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be Bold!!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Jo e I 00:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Manchester

Hi! I've noticed your excellent work you have been putting in on Wikipedia, particularly for those articles related to the Greater Manchester area.

I also put in simillar kind of work for this area and am most pleased with your contributions. You may wish to add (via copy and paste) the following to your user page (found at User:Mapmark)...

{{User Greater Manchester}}

It enables other users from this area to share knowledge and form a network specifically for the Greater Manchester area.

Hope that helps, keep up the good work. Jhamez84 15:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jhamez

Thats very kind of you notice my contribs and to send me a message. I dont seem to have a proper user page yet but when I get round to building one I will be proud to add the paste you suggest on Greater Manchester. I mostly use wikipedia late at night after I've done my other work and like many people get caught up in pages I'm interested in and happen to have a bit of knowledge about. I just hope that my contribs are useful and I try and stick to the guidelines but I dont really consider myself an expert so I'm happy to be re-edited! Very pleasing to see a lot of what I've put up has stayed there so I guess I must be doing something right! Also when I get a proper user page I can probably send a neater message back to you Jhamez, as opposed to pasting here where I'm not sure you will ever see it! But once again many thanks for your encouragment and all the best with you posts too. :-) Mark —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mapmark (talk • contribs) 13:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Not a problem! Indeed it is most encouraging seeing a new(ish) user contributing with prudence, expertise, and a level head (which is in my experience a rarity!).

Editing level and sophistication will improve with time (indeed I am still by no means an expert, but perhaps a novice), via looking at examples of Wikipedia's best work, and through consulting users for advice and input.

Given your contributions, I want to highlight some important and established practices found on Wikipedia, and answer some of your questions...

You can access your own user page by clicking here - it's yours to edit as and when you please - but does like all pages, ultimately belong to Wikipedia and is best not used to provoke other users.

In talk/discussion pages, don't forget to sign your comments. You do this by typing "~~~~" (4 x ~). It just lets users know who wrote what and when, and is considered good manners.

Another point for ensuring that other users know what and how you are editting, when contributing to an article, there is a small field labeled "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

It is highly recommended that users fill in the edit summary field with a breif statement of how and what they are contributing, as it makes it easier for you and your fellow contributors to understand what has changed, and is helpful when going through the history of the page.

Finally, and somewhat sadly, vandalism is rife on Wikipedia, and should you take an interest in Greater Manchester and other divisions of England's lands like myself, there is a policy on how they should be treated. I've added a summery of a major policy of Wikipedia below for ease, outlining a ruling on how modern geography should be presented (naturally I am in agreement with this).

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) Counties of Britain

This page in a nutshell: All Wikipedia articles about an existing British settlement or locality should use the current, administrative, county (e.g. Greater Manchester). Metropolitan counties, and other such modern counties, should be treated as counties and as a primary geographic reference frame. We should not take the minority position that the historic counties still exist with the former boundaries.

Many thanks for the contact Mapmark. I hope a few of those points will aid you in your forthcoming additions on Wikipedia, and steer you away from some of the mistakes I made initially. If ever you would like advise or an answer to how to perform more technical edits, do please get in touch! Regards, Jhamez84 23:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Metromapunderwear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Metromapunderwear.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Loud & proud flyer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Loud & proud flyer.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Duefox.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Duefox.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Transit Maps Book Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Transit Maps Book Cover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:WORLD-METRO-MAP-2005.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:WORLD-METRO-MAP-2005.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WORLD-METRO-MAP-2005.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WORLD-METRO-MAP-2005.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —PNG crusade bot ^(feedback) 18:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing Subway Plan

Hi,

No, I'm not affiliated with either the Olympics or the Beijing Subway; I'm just an enthusiast. I've uploaded an updated version of the map without the watermark. As for permission, the image is under the GFDL license, essentially meaning that you can use it for anything as long as you also provide, along with the distribution, the source of the image and the GFDL license in some form. The full text is here:

Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License

-- ran (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don't have any contacts with the Beijing Subway, and I don't have any photographs of the official Beijing Subway map. -- ran (talk) 18:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of OutSpoken Productions

An article that you have been involved in editing, OutSpoken Productions, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OutSpoken Productions. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Schuym1 (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Metrolink_3a_proposed.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Metrolink_3a_proposed.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I nominated the image for deletion is that it is not currently used in any articles. Wikipedia does not host orphan images. Can you add the image to an appropriate article? -Thanks Nv8200p talk 00:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also deleted Image:Metrolink 3a In-Car Diagram V4 new.jpg. a few days ago because somehow the image got corrupted. Maybe you are thinking about this image instead? If so, can you re-upload because something happened to the image and it would not display properly. -Regards, Nv8200p talk 00:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK I can see what's happened now and after posting to you I understood what "orphaned" meant! Yep the image that got corrupted I will find again (cant right now as not on the correct machine) and re jupload. The one you deleted was indeed "orphaned" coz i'd found a better version (the one that got ssomehow got corrupted afterwards!) SO: thanks so much for pointing that all out and hope to have the new image back up in a day or two. Cheers, Mark talk 01:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say

That I like your username! --Lamadude (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out

User:Drew R. Smith/game

AfD nomination of Edmond Huet

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Edmond Huet. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmond Huet. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2000s (Decade) | Names of the Decade

Would you be able to provide an opinion on the "Names of the Decade" rewrite debate?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2000s_(decade)#Request_for_consensus_concerning:_Names_of_the_decade

Thanks. Artx (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twopenneth duly added! :-) --Mapmark (talk) 22:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Car 697 1913 Princess Rd Depot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Car 697 1913 Princess Rd Depot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mapmark. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
Message added 01:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ww2censor (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Camberwell copy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Camberwell copy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfC tagging

You tagged an article with a request for comment template - these templates go on the talk page to head a debate on an issue. You may need to revisit whatever was at dispute and re-add the RfC on the talk page to gain outside opinions. See WP:RFC. Fences&Windows 03:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Susie Pearl, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Madonna and Success (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susie Pearl

The article Susie Pearl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this person meets the notability criteria; the sole independent reference is a passing mention.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 18:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Ovenden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Around The World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Telephony In Greater Manchester

added links pointing to Strowger, Royal Exchange, Winter Hill, Salford, Queen Victoria Street and Museum of Science and Industry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mapmark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Tankard

Hello, thanks for your edits to the Jeremy Tankard article. I see you and another account and IP have made a lot of changes, most of which are really good improvements.

However, I see that some details, like date and place of birth, are unsourced and I'm guessing are from personal knowledge - would I be right in thinking that you know Mr. Tankard? Unless there's a published source for this information (e.g. on Mr. Tankard's website or an interview), it might be best to remove it, since it's a problem if we have information on living people that can't be verified.

Let me know what you think. Blythwood (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed I did and thanks for your notes and appreciation Blythwood. Not helped with a living person's article for a while so hadn't realised that such verifications were needed and for sure I will attempt to find some. Wee bit busy for next week so if by chance you spot one in those places and can add before me do please go ahead. And thanks again for having started the article. (I do know him professionally yes). :-)

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=2oczE7SODTUnF5j_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_0CAzDpepXWx0Lw9&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mapmark. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Metrolink 3a In-Car Diagram V4 new.jpg

The file File:Metrolink 3a In-Car Diagram V4 new.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Manchester Metrolink - Schemaplan.png which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Metrolink 3a proposed.gif

The file File:Metrolink 3a proposed.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Socialist-Youth-LPYS-Paper-.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Socialist-Youth-LPYS-Paper-.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metrolink 3a proposed.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Metrolink 3a proposed.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 20:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]