Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 November 19
Appearance
November 19
[edit]- Several free images of the same artist exists. Liftarn (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- keep - User:Liftarn has been tirelessly promoting POV on the Carlos Latuff article. I've been archiving work by Latuff for a short while now and encountered extreme resistance by him to anything that might make the artists' attacks on his usual objects (israel and the US) seem over the top and anti-semitic. current image was released as "copyright free" by the propagandist, however, he has used one image who's copyright status is not entirely clear. yes, there's a few more hatefull images by him, but there are no free images with sharon doing the hitler salute in such a clear manner. image should stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaakobou (talk • contribs) 15:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Jaakobou has been tirelessly promoting POV on the Carlos Latuff article by cherrypicking and distortion as well as adding unsourced statements. // Liftarn (talk)
"keep" I have seen a number of Latuff cartoons with comparisons between Israel and Nazis and also he tends to use the term "IsraeHell" in instead of Israel. However I've not yet seen a cartoon by him so clearly demonstrating the issue of his continuous statements that Israel= nazi Germany.I don't believe theres is a free replacement for this image. and if theres is,the delation nominator should provide it.Batlily (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Commons:Category:Carlos Latuff has several images. Pick one. If it's such a common theme you would have no problem finding a free replacement. // Liftarn (talk)
- speedy keep the cartoonist is anti-copyright. The objection that it's "non-free" is wrong. <<-armon->> (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, but it is a derivative work of a non-free image. // Liftarn (talk)
- comment - how does Liftarn knows the original is "non-free"? can you back up this claim? JaakobouChalk Talk 23:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, but it is a derivative work of a non-free image. // Liftarn (talk)
- Mrchadsexington (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image was uploaded for use in Stretch Skin Therapy, which was speedied. I can't see any reason to keep this now... uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 18:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Always logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Aussie logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Greggreggreg (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Charmin.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Downy logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- SEANBROSNAN (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:FolgersLogo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- SEANBROSNAN (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Gillette logo bw.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Logo-headandshoulders.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Max Factor.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Unicel logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:AtaConnect.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Celerond2006.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Pikachu9000 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Ckvu.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:EAF.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not the exact same image. Fair use rationale provided. Should be a speedy keep. Miranda 18:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Pufferfish101 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Fallibroome High School Logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Girls gone wild logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Greyhound dog.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Simonlebon (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Indiglo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Jarritos logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- RAW Vegetto (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Ninja Turtles, The Next Mutation.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Soakologist (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:P4ee.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Pafbadge.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sovietcollector (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Pamperlogo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Pentium m 2006.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Personatv.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:PsionTeklogix logo.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Pikachu9000 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Utv.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:WORLD-METRO-MAP-2005.png made this image obsolete. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rudidude86 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Permisson given from copyright holder, but there is no indication that the image is released under a free license. Can't be used under fair use, since it is replaceable and fails WP:NFCC#1 Rettetast 20:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wassssuuuup! (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Possibly a copivio, unused Rettetast 20:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wassssuuuup! (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- possibly a copybio. Unused Rettetast 20:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Vinny_pappy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Wikipeia is given permission, but that is not a free license. Unused. Rettetast 20:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- TubularWorld (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned image, created by myself. Made obsolete by new image. TubularWorld (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Clearly a derivative work from nonfree material. -- RG2 22:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- No evidence image has been released into the public domain. -- RG2 22:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Works of the U.S. federal government are automatically in the public domain. This isn't necessarily true for local or state governments. -- RG2 23:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Screenshot; clearly not free. -- RG2 23:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Screenshot; clearly not free. -- RG2 23:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic -- RG2 23:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Work of a school district, which is not part of the federal government and whose works are not automatically in the public domain. -- RG2 23:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Works by school districts in the U.S. are not automatically in the public domain. -- RG2 23:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Unsourced, questionable licensing given uploader's history. Orphaned. -- RG2 23:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned. Questionable uploader history, given that he has claimed derivative works as his own. -- RG2 23:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - LQ & probable CV, per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Mynameisjim93 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. This is a press photo, so it fails non-free content criterion #2, as we clearly infringe on commerical opportunities. The claim on the image description page that this is "very rare" makes it that much more valuable to the copyright holder. Listing here as a courtesy, as press photos can be speedily deleted as copyright violations (G12, see this precedent). -- RG2 23:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The fair use rationale seems to be valid.Ngchen (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- And there seems to be an awful bias that throwing up a generic fair use rationale is good enough -- at least for keeping the bots at bay. Unfortunately, a misleading rationale doesn't get around the fact that this image spectacularly fails our non-free content criteria. -- RG2 09:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- So how does the image detract from the Orange County register's business in any way?Ngchen (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC) The image is a nice illustration of the various FLOTUS's the U.S. has had.Ngchen (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- And there seems to be an awful bias that throwing up a generic fair use rationale is good enough -- at least for keeping the bots at bay. Unfortunately, a misleading rationale doesn't get around the fact that this image spectacularly fails our non-free content criteria. -- RG2 09:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - How are the two rationale's misleading? Happyme22 (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Because this is such a blatant copyright violation that I should really speedy delete it. -- RG2 19:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Please avoid copyright paranoia. But upon a seond look at [1] you're right in that the image fails the guideline an image is only fair use if we're commenting on the image itself. See especially the Barry Bonds example. So, sadly, it is a case of delete.Ngchen (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Because this is such a blatant copyright violation that I should really speedy delete it. -- RG2 19:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The fair use rationale seems to be valid.Ngchen (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)