User talk:Mantuku

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mantuku (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only ever used one account. Please tell me what other accounts I am meant to have used? I looked a bit further and can see that this account has been listed as the reason for my being blocked https://guc.toolforge.org/?by=date&user=Custodi2 It looks like a dormant account that has no activity since 2015 then has just been blocked and used to block my account. This reason to block my account is not only incorrect, the reasoning and method used to support the block are highly suspicious.

Decline reason:

You were asked if you had anything to do, even not involving payment, with The Lottery Corporation. You seem to have pretended that question was never asked, because you kept right on making edits that appeared to promote it like some of the other socks mentioned at the SPI. And now you wonder why you were blocked? — Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Reply I do not pretend to be an expert in editing articles or the myriad of rules and acronyms used in this situation. The edits I made were purely factual in nature e.g. updating internal links. I did not even create the article for The Lottery Corporation nor do I know who did. I even reached out for assistance from Chiro725 which just seemed to result in a nomination to block me. I find this treatment of my account to manifestly unfair.[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hi, Mantuku, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia! Here are some links that may help you:

The Teahouse, a place to get advice about editing
Manual of Style, which shows you how to write articles
The Five Pillars, features which all articles should have

You may also be interested in WikiProject Equine, which writes and improves articles about horses, horse sports (including the Olympic disciplines), horse care and training, or WikiProject Horse racing, which focuses on horse races, racehorses, and jockeys. Please remember to sign your talk page posts with four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your username and the date. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. And again, welcome! White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 23:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Lotteries editor. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GlobalX

The article GlobalX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the notability guidelines for companies. (Not to be confused with Global X ETFs, which came up a lot in my source searches).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Teratix ₵ 10:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:The Lott Logo 2019.png

Thanks for uploading File:The Lott Logo 2019.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Lott logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Lott logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:The Lott Logo 2020.png

Thanks for uploading File:The Lott Logo 2020.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Lott Logo 2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Lott Logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Lott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chirota (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tattersall's Sweeps for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tattersall's Sweeps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tattersall's Sweeps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chirota (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ubet (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ubet (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubet (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chirota (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Lott Logo 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Lott Logo 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently The Lott article where the logo appeared is redirected to Tabcorp. It is proposed to redirect The Lott to The Lottery Corporation and expand the content there including the use of this logo. Mantuku (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mantuku. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page The Lottery Corporation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chirota (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet Investigation

You may be involved in a SPI discussion. Chirota (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]