Jump to content

User talk:Managerarc/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Managerarc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Jpeeling (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ali zafar.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Ali zafar.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ali zafar.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Humayun Saeed.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Humayun Saeed.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Humayun Saeed.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:NehaDhupia.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NehaDhupia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)(Talk) 15:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Optical Network Unit

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Optical Network Unit, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.huihongfiber.com/optical-network-unit.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —SpaceFlight89 16:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Souten.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Souten.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY (TALK) 07:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ashes to Ashes (2010 film)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ashes to Ashes (2010 film). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashes to Ashes (2010 film). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Do not insert unreferenced material in Waheed Murad

You have inserted an unreferenced material in the article Waheed Murad dated 8 November, 2009. Wikipedia has special concern on unreferenced material esp. in the articles relating to persons alive and/or died during the past 100 years. Kindly read the Terms of Use before editing any material. Continuous infringements of the Terms or insertion of copyrighted material may lead to suspension of your account. Thank You.

I hav'nt added any unreferenced material in the mentioned article. Please confirm before issuing any such warning.Managerarc (talk) 14:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Managerarc. You have new messages at Talk:Girlfriend (2004 film).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rog

Ever since my edits were improved by you, the whole story is twisted way different from the actual plot. If you say, I'll revert your edit with mine. Movie Rox (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Raajneeti Critical Reception

Wikipedia Manual of Style clearly states that review aggregators can be used. It is not spam. Stop deleting it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mallumax (talk • contribs) 13:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Optical Network Unit

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Optical Network Unit, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.huihongfiber.com/optical-network-unit.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ashes to Ashes (2010 film)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ashes to Ashes (2010 film). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashes to Ashes (2010 film). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

G'day

Nice work on the Aus v Pak article. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 21:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

3 Idiots

Hi, thanks for not reverting straight away and coming into discussion.

I feel that Three Idiots will eventually become a mcuh viewed article in the future, and the normal format has been applied. See Lagaan, Dasavathaaram, Bommarillu etc for the original version. Table formats for cast died out three years ago. Universal Hero (talk) 19:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, tough it has. Most articles have it that way, and there has been a changung trend. Universal Hero (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Cricket scorecards

I'd invite your comment at: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket#Scorecards on wikipedia. Harrias (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

yo--[M]anagerarc(talk) 21:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:ROLLBACK

Hi. I've added the flag for you. Any problems please ask! Happy editing. Pedro :  Chat  22:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Starplus logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starplus logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey editor, this is British writing section. We used the proper british english language here.

Hey editor, this is British english, language section, in here we used the proper British english language and not American English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.102.3 (talk) 15:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

hey this is an encyclopedia, use proper English writings forms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.102.3 (talk) 15:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You have to used proper English language and the proper English Language is the British forms of writing and not the American style of writing. What's America have to do with cricket? They don't even play this game on their country.

Your Indian you should know your british colonial ideology. Stick to the British and European way.

The other article who has perfect article is Wasim Akram. The article looks respectable and easy to read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.102.3 (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Template:Limited Overs Matches

The blue background looked ridiculous, in my opinion. As far as I know, no other major sports result box has a background by default; see {{footballbox}} and {{rugbybox}}. I have made it possible for you to set a background colour using |bg=. Feel free to revert my changes and we can have a fuller discussion at WT:CRIC, but I don't see why the background was even there in the first place. – PeeJay 13:19, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Apartment-2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Love Aaj Kal vs Three Times

Hi. I saw your recent edit here. Ya know that citation was written before LAK even came out. Seeing both movies, I would say it is in no way at all a remake. Maybe its time to delete this totally. Have you seen them both? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 14:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star plus logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star plus logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Raavan / WP:RFPP

Hello, Managerarc. You have new messages at WP:RFPP.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR 11:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Compliment

Just wanted to say I admire your work at Raajneeti, keeping that article up to encyclopedic standards and reverting non-constructive edits. Kudos! --Tenebrae (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Replyre

Hey friend. Yes, succession boxes should be removed elsewhere as it was discussed and agreed on WP:FILM. I will step by step create templates for every award category for Filmfare. Shahid • Talk2me 16:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Converted to PROD: Malamaal Weekly 2

Hello Managerarc, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged (Malamaal Weekly 2) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! decltype (talk) 17:16, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Irrfan Khan

Hey manageroc, I saw the reference you added for Irrfan khan's faith. But is that a reliable source? Can you please explain to me what a reliable source would be for an individual's religion on wikipedia. Many articles have no source cited for religion and the ones that do have a source have a very sketchy-borderline-unreliable source. This (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources) is helpful, but lay it our for me simply. -incognito222 Incognito222 (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Theleftorium (talk) 10:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Considering the fact that I already warned you about this at Girlfriend (2004 film), you will be blocked indefinitely the next time you copy text from sources. Theleftorium (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification of CCI

Hello, Managerarc. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --Theleftorium (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Mallika Sherawat

Hey, Thanks for cleaning the citations. Do you know how we can update Mallika's image. Its very poor and old. I m seeing that all images were uploaded from bollywoodhungama.com only. Is there any we can get a copyright free image from other websites and put it here? I m trying to improve Mallika's wiki page. Thanks for your help chandu 13:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandutweets (talk • contribs)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Managerarc/Archive_1&oldid=1139544598"