Talk:Girlfriend (2004 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

No mention of protests?

I know this is a very small article which has largely been maintained by very few people, but I'm surprised that there is no mention of the protests in 2004 in response to this movie. Here are some links for anyone who is interested: https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/sena-boys-can-t-stand-girlfriend-film-yanked-off-mumbai-screens-after-rampage/cid/737387 https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/society-the-arts/films/story/20040628-rss-lesbian-gay-groups-protest-against-karan-razdan-movie-girlfriend-789786-2004-06-28 Cool12y (talk) 01:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing copyright issues

The plot synopsis in this article began as a copy of [1] and remains an unusable unauthorized derivative work of that source. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

Sapna finds herself in a relationship with Rahul and by the time Tanya is back, Sapna has already fallen for Rahul and starts loving him. [...] her hidden agenda and desires come to light in the later part of the film.

The article says:

Sapna finds that she has started to develop a relationship with Rahul. By the time Tanya comes back, Sapna has already fallen in love with Rahul. [...] Her hidden past comes to light in the later part of the film

There are other passages that similarly follow too closely.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this plot synopsis should be rewritten from scratch. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution.

Please let me know if you have questions about this. The leftorium 00:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried my ultimate best to rewrite the synopsis, but still I am not able to write the whole by myself. So any help will be appreciated. Managerarc (talk) 11:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the plot summary in a way that doesn't violate copyright. Please take a look. I hope this helps. :) Regards, The leftorium 12:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's awesome, thanks a million for your efforts. Managerarc (talk) 14:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just keep in mind that it is always better to simply write the text from scratch using your own words instead of copying and altering the sentences. :) The leftorium 15:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]