User talk:Malik2308

This is Malik2308's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This defuser most likely is notable–Washington Post dedicated an entire article about him.

This article seems like a praise more than an encyclopedic article. I can tell that his deed's are noble. He risks his life everyday after all. However, we strive to have neutrality in our articles.

For example, text like

"His expertise has played a pivotal role in the successful convictions of numerous terrorists." are not natural in tone. Words like "highly regarded" or "distinguished" are subjective opinions and should be removed. I suggest reading WP:PEACOCK. Continue working on this, it has potiential!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. The term where his experience has played a vitol role in conviction of numerous terrorists is correct. The actual figure is 5000+ cases which is mentioned in newspapers and many articles published on various occasions. If you prefer, i can edit some things. Malik2308 (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, then you can say that he worked on 5000+ cases. However, "played a vital role" is vague and unhelpful to the readers. MY suggestion is to states facts rather than interpretations. Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malik2308! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib I would like to clarify that this article is not about me, but rather about someone I know. Malik2308 (talk) 13:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you may want to see WP:CONFLICT. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 14:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shafqat Ullah Malik, S.St

Hello, Malik2308. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shafqat Ullah Malik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]