User talk:Malcolm77

Allegory

Welcome to Wikipedia. I deleted the long list of unreferenced examples to the article on allegory because it has no place there. It is random, uncited, based on the personal opinion of editors and formed about half article. I had floated this move on the article talk page and nobody queried this decision. If you wish to take issue with the edit, please discuss it on the article talk page. Thank you Span (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contacting me. I think the deletion goes alright. I was also thinking about the sense of this list, and actually tried to make it a bit more systematic, but probably the subject is much too broad for that indeed. --Malcolm77 (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Malcolm77. You have new messages at Evanh2008's talk page.
Message added 10:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 10:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/Members and editing opera articles

I don't see your name on the list of WP Opera members, but maybe you'd like to consider joining and help improve them based on established guidelines agreed to by consensus?

In that regard, you might like to refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/Article styles and formats. Viva-Verdi (talk) 22:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Belarus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2009/belarus |title=Nations in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale

Hi! I've noticed your recent edits on the Ingmar Bergman article. I find them useful, but I just want to point up one issue. You inserted into the article four images (movie posters) that are copyrighted ([1], [2]), but have no wp:fair use rationale for use in that article. Wikipedia's wp:Non-free content policy dictates that non-free media has to have a fair use rationale for every article. Since those images you've inserted do not have written fair use rationale for use in the Ingmar Bergman article, their inclusion in the article constitutes a copyrights violation, and I removed them ([3]).

Wikipedia's Non-free content policy states that copyrighted content may be used only in certain circumstances. One of the conditions that has to be met is the so-called contextual significance: non-free images may be included into the article only if their inclusion is absolutely necessary to understand the article. And, the movie posters are certainly not necessary to understand the article about the movie director. So, the problem is not the lack of the fair use rationale, but the lack of the fair use itself. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I had no idea, and just thought that – the posters being free in some context – that would be so for all of the English Wikipedia. --Malcolm77 (talk) 13:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Carte ethnographique de l'Europe centrale et des états Balkaniques - La Science et la Vie 1918, P.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Carte ethnographique de l'Europe centrale et des états Balkaniques - La Science et la Vie 1918, P.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Sweden may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

].</ref> [[Fort Christina]] the first settlement, named after the reigning Swedish monarch (the sole daughter of [[Gustavus Adolphus| Gustavus Adolphus the Great]] (Swedish: ''Gustav Adolf

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Malcolm77. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Malcolm77. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Malcolm77. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

Hi Malcolm77, you're absolutely correct about the Greek italics, I have overlooked that part of your edits, I apologize for it. I will fix that to spare you the effort. As for the non-italic reconstructions, that's common style in historical linguistics. I'll remove the remaining italics with subsequent edits. –Austronesier (talk) 11:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's true I'm only dabbling in PIE linguistics, so thanks for the information. There are also some asterisks missing at some of the laryngeals. --Malcolm77 (talk) 11:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Odysseus

Thanks for improving the names section. I'm still not sure I understand it, though. It now reads "The form with -δ- (also Odyseus Ὀδυσεύς) is only attested in epic literature." But Sophocles, Euripedes, Aristotle, Polybius, Pausanias, et al. all use Ὀδυσσ- (for example, [4]). So what exactly is the form with -δ- that is only found in Epic? Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 21:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you must be right. I didn't check this. So, that piece of information (about the forms with δ, see the quote below) comes from the Etymological Dictionary of Greek by R. S. P. Beekes. I understand it in that way, that the classical authors followed Homer's example, which seems also to be a plausible hypothesis. Only one thing strikes me as odd: he calls the forms with -λ- "by-forms" ... whereas they could also be the original or main form according to his argumentation.

"Epic also Ὀδυσεύς (metrical shortening? Cf. on Ἀχιλλεύς). Several by-forms with λ (cf. Schwyzer: 209 and 333, Heubeck 1961: 24ff.): Ὀλυσ(σ)εύς, Ὀλυτ(τ)εύς, Ὀλισεύς, etc. (vase-inscr.), Οὐλιξεύς (Hdn. Gr.), Lat. Ulixēs. The form with -δ- is only ascertained by epic literature."

According to Beekes, the association with the verb ὀδύσσομαι (odyssomai) is folk etymological and was also established by the epic poets. Beekes' resumé on the etymology is this:

"Connected by the epic poets (e.g. τ 407ff.) with ὀδύσσομαι, which is folk-etymological (Linde Glotta 13 (1924): 223, Risch 1947: 82f., Stanford Class. Phil. 47 (1952): 209ff.). Modern interpreters sought the origin of the name in the Greek West or on the continent on the one hand, and in Asia Minor on the other. Those who argue for western, Illyrian-Epirotic origin are Helbig Herm. 11 (1876): 281 (doubts by Kretschmer 1896: 280ff. with Ed. Meyer), Krahe IF 49 (1931): 143, and van Windekens Herm. 86 (1958): 121 ff.; for continental origin, Boßhardt 1942: 138f. (also on the phonetics); for origin in Asia Minor, Hrozný Arch. Orbis 1 (1929): 338, Gemser Archiv für Orientforschung 3 (1926): 183 (from Babyl. Hitt. Ul(l)uš ?; on this, see Kretschmer Glotta 18 (1930): 215), and Kretschmer Glotta 28 (1940): 253 and 278 (Odysseus as an Anatolian hero, related to Hatt. Λύξης, Lyd. Λίξος). Doubtful attempts to connect the name Ὀδυσσεύς with the name of his maternal grandfather Αὐτόλυκος by Bolling AmJPh. 27 (1906): 65ff. and Bolling Lang. 29 (1953): 293f. However, the name is typically Pre-Greek (see Fur. index) on account of the many variants. Faure's connection with ὀλίγος (Faure 1980: 33) is therefore wrong."

("Ὀδυσσεύς" in: Etymological Dictionary of Greek, edited by: Robert S. P. Beekes (Ph.D. 1969). Consulted online on 30 August 2020. First published online: October 2010.)

So, hello, Stavros. By the way, I'm Matthaios, another Greek of the diaspora. Nice to talk to you.

--Malcolm77 (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]