User talk:MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani

Welcome!

Hello, MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thazathu Chandapilla Kathanar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Bruce1ee^talk 17:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thazathu Chandapilla Kathanar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thazathu Chandapilla Kathanar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Malankara Metropolitan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheAwesome Hwyh 19:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Malankara Metropolitan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. TheAwesome Hwyh 19:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What source do you need? Should I bring the Kalpana and the Metropolitans Consecration liturgy? MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liturgical Calendar of the Mar Thoma Syrian Church moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Liturgical Calendar of the Mar Thoma Syrian Church, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. creffett (talk) 19:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More additions to this page shall be added soon. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Malankara Metropolitans into Malankara Syrian Metropolitans. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vestments in the Mar Thoma Syrian Church

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vestments in the Mar Thoma Syrian Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://misc.co.in/what-each-rite-ritual-symbol-means/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cmon Dude? REALLY? I'VE GIVEN TUE CITATIONS TO THE WEBSITE AS WELL. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 09:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vestments in the Mar Thoma Syrian Church

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vestments in the Mar Thoma Syrian Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://misc.co.in/what-each-rite-ritual-symbol-means/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. please stop posting copyright text Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dionysius IV of Cheppad. Elizium23 (talk) 07:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Mar Thoma Syrian Church (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Your recent editing history at Mar Thoma Syrian Church shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please be aware that the Mar Thoma Syrian Church article is not "your business" and you do not own it. It is Wikipedia's business. You are not permitted to tell others not to edit it and you need to try to reach consensus with other editors. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani. Please be aware that the next time you revert at Mar Thoma Syrian Church you are risking a block. Have patience and wait for others to agree with you. If they don't agree, you shouldn't go ahead regardless. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. EdJohnston (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston (talk · contribs) Isnt the other editor affected by the same blockage. I believe his is not ready to talk and sort the same. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 13:22, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have edited the article four times and the other party has done it only three times. You should wait for agreement. Your change *does* appear to be unsourced POV-pushing. Your own personal evaluation of the history and beliefs of the church is not a source for Wikipedia. We need published sources. EdJohnston (talk) 14:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston should it be web sources. Could it be written articles published in the offical magazine of the Church? MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 14:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The official magazine would be considered a self published source and would not be acceptable for Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 14:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston then what is the source that is to be attributed. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston the wikipedia instructions does say Magazines are allowed. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A church magazine would only be allowed to describe the church's view of itself. It couldn't be used to objectively place the church with respect to other churches in Asia. For that, you would be better off with a scholarly work, by someone not affiliated with any of the churches. EdJohnston (talk) 18:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liturgical Calendar of the Mar Thoma Syrian Church

Hello, MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liturgical Calendar of the Mar Thoma Syrian Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unwanted Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

From what I understand I have been blocked for something called as sockpuppetery. From what I understand a sockpuppet is someone who creates and account for deception or uses multiple accounts to spread false information. This is a wrong charge that has been levied on me. I have only used the account MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani to edit writings or informations which does not completely encopass the truth. I am from Kerla, India and a Christian, hence a majority of my editing is solely on the ancient Indian Church and the denominations that are part of the same. I have to my best extent provided truthful information with citations ans references. There are a lot of people who are unwantedly editing and has tried to demean other cultures, I have tried to prevent that and ask then to make such actions. I have to my best knowlege provided actual truths. And it really pains me that the contribution that I have made has all become futile, especially the article of Mar Thoma Syrian Church is all distorted by a wikipedia users when they got the chace to do so. I hope my appeal to unblock will be heard by the volunteer team of wikepdia, and unblock me so that I may continue to percieve to providing the right facts. Thank youMalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 07:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are accused of being Kkktpkirij (talk · contribs). Please address this in your next unblock request, not whether your edits are truthful. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please check on this block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting the wikipedia admins to check this block. It is stated that I was blocked for Kkktpkirij which I believe is sockpuppeting. I assure you I have not done any form of sockpuppeting to the best of my knowledge. If there has been a mistake which I made unknowingly, I apologise to the wikipedia community as a whole. Requesting the admins once again to unblock so that I can continue to help spreading knowledgeMalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 2:12 pm, 7 August 2020, Friday (12 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Based on the edit histories of both accounts, you seem to be the same user. If you want to appeal your block, you'll need to do so through your original account. only (talk) 21:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Elizium23Hi, can you tell me what is the name of my other account? I dont remember having another account. Please let me see if I can fix it. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Please, check on this block

Dear admins I am Requesting the wikipedia admins to check this block. It is stated that I was blocked for Kkktpkirij which I believe is sockpuppeting. I assure you I have not done any form of sockpuppeting to the best of my knowledge. If there has been a mistake which I made unknowingly, I apologise to the wikipedia community as a whole. Requesting the admins once again to unblock so that I can continue to help spreading knowledge. This is the third time that I am requesting to unblock, I affirm that I have not done anything wrong. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 12:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed your second unblock request to a comment. There is no need - and no benefit to opening multiple requests. SQL ^{Query me!} 13:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{SQL}} But why is there no respone regarding the same. MalankaraSuriyaniNazrani (talk) 04:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Malankara Syrian Metropolitans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Malankara Syrian Metropolitans. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Malankara Metropolitans. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Malankara Metropolitan. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. J.Stalin S ^Talk 14:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at Malankara Syrian Metropolitans. Elizium23 (talk) 14:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]