Jump to content

User talk:Makellbird

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Makell Bird

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Makell Bird requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 07:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:3_of_Makell_Bird's_albums.gif listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:3_of_Makell_Bird's_albums.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Slacker (music service), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 21:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to ITunes. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 21:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ADED.US (September 25)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Makellbird, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ADED.US, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Makellbird. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "ADED.US".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ADED.US}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ADED.US (April 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that this account exists only for the purpose of promoting yourself and your business, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a free advertising service. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than yourself and your business, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you are considering requesting an unblock, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]