User talk:Mahira Rafique

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mahira Rafique! Thank you for your contributions. I am Owais Khursheed and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 05:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Marvi Memon has been reverted.
Your edit here to Marvi Memon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://marvimemon.wordpress.com/marvi-memon) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mahira Rafique, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mahira Rafique! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Marvi Memon, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Marvi Memon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://marvimemon.wordpress.com/marvi-memon/, http://marvimemon.wordpress.com/marvi-memon/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your recent editing history at Marvi Memon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mahira Rafique. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Marvi Memon, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Facing the Sky (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marvi Memon

Hi, I understand you may not be that familiar with our policies, but unfortunately the content you are trying to add is not acceptable in its current fashion. I see you are trying to add some references but they need to be inline with the text, please see WP:REFBEGIN. This is especially important because it is a biography of a living person. Anyway, why don't we first discuss what's wrong with the existing, properly sourced version. Is there something inaccurate? Let's continue the discussion on the talk page at Talk:Marvi Memon. Continuing to edit war may result in you being blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 08:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because of trolling/spam edit of the page: Marvi_Memon It is requested that the authentic & updated information please be maintained & given protection as in: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvi_Memon&oldid=636440258

It cannot be protected unless there's a clear case of disruption, which there is not. Please also understand Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, no sole person dictates what an article will say, even if that person is the subject of the article. You should also be very careful not to exert a conflict of interest. At any rate, we want to make sure the facts are straight. What is wrong with the older version? You still have not stated that. Please again explain your intentions on the talk page so that everyone else is aware. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes i have given the reasons on marvi memon talk page. Mahira Rafique (talk) 08:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You still can not edit war. Clearly there are others that disagree with your changes. Remember this is a collaborative effort. Consider this a final warning, you need to discuss with others to build a consensus before re-adding the content. We are reasonable people, if we calmly work together we can find something we all agree on. Please remain civil in the discussion. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Marvi Memon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Khadar Khani (talk) 12:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Marvi Memon.

MeeGhaMan (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MarviMemon.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:MarviMemon.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gaff (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Wikipedias in Pakistani languages

hey Dear, You are cordially invited to the Urdu Wikipedia , Sindhi Wikipedia, Punjabi Wikipedia...Awaiting you at Sindhi Wikipedia, Thanks..Admin SdWiki...-Jogi 007 (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your addition to Marvi Memon has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marvi Memon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]