User talk:Magdalena Trajkovska

April 2020

Hello, I'm Sek-2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Windows XP have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sek-2 (talk) 12:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Windows 7. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sek-2 (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Windows 7, you may be blocked from editing. Sek-2 (talk) 20:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied text from Windows 7 to Windows Server 2008 R2 (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Windows 7. Sek-2 (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Magdalena Trajkovska. You've been reported for WP:Vandalism at WP:AIV for making this edit at Windows 7. The reporting editor said "Inserting incorrect info into articles. Also does weird things like adding the archive URL component into citation templates, but the links themselves aren't any different from the non-archive links." You may wish to respond to the complaint. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]