User talk:Magadhahistorian

July 2023

Hello, I'm Admantine123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Admantine123 (talk) 17:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Admantine123,

Thank you for reaching out and for your diligence in maintaining the reliability of Wikipedia's content. I apologize for not providing a reliable source for the content I added or changed. It was not intentional, and I appreciate your prompt action in removing and archiving it.

I will make sure to review the referencing guidelines for beginners and ensure that I include proper citations when re-adding the content. If you have any specific suggestions or sources that would be appropriate, please feel free to share them with me.

Again, I apologize for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Best regards,

Admantine123 Magadhahistorian (talk) 03:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Atwood machine. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 08:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Framawiki,

Thank you for your message and for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for any oversight on my part in not citing verifiable and reliable sources for the content I added to the Atwood machine article.

I completely understand the importance of maintaining the accuracy and credibility of Wikipedia articles, and I acknowledge that reliable sources are essential to support any edits made to the page. I will take your advice to heart and ensure that I follow the guidelines outlined in Wikipedia:Citing sources.

In the future, before making any further edits, I will be sure to discuss potentially controversial changes on the article's talk page to seek input from the community and ensure a collaborative and transparent approach.

Again, I apologize for any inconvenience my previous actions may have caused, and I appreciate your guidance. If you have any further suggestions or concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know. I am committed to improving my contributions and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

Best regards, Magadhahistorian (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Protist, you may be blocked from editing. Donald Albury 11:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

I am striking this warning as the edit it was in response to was earlier than the previous warning and response above. I am assuming from the editor's response that they now understand about the need for sourcing, thus making my warning redundant and unnecessary. - Donald Albury 14:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice regarding subject area

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

BlackcurrantTea (talk) 22:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will certainly take the time to review the guidance on these sanctions to ensure that my contributions align with the established guidelines. If I have any questions or uncertainties about the appropriateness of certain edits, I will not hesitate to seek clarification from you or other experienced editors. Magadhahistorian (talk) 06:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Layah50. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shunga Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！) 00:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man, That's Bharhuta Stupa. But their it it written only Bharhuta so I add "

Stupa "word to improve it's grammatically.

I think you misunderstood. Please recheck.

Thank You. Magadhahistorian (talk) 00:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maurya Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 01:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Jonathan , the unauthentic rejected photo you're protecting will definitely one day create chaos . If any Indian government official will see such things regarding their History. Then they'll definately send notice to Wikipedia official for removal of such unauthorised rejected photo. Like they did a month ago regarding Indian cricketer issue...

I will definitely send "Indian Education Minister" letter to inform about this Anti Indian Propagandist act happening on Wikipedia....

for removal of such pic protected by some so callesome d whitguys e Administrators . Magadhahistorian (talk) 02:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller and RegentsPark: is this a legal threat? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Magadhahistorian! Your additions to Protist have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 06:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Doug Weller,

I appreciate your message and the guidance you've provided regarding Wikipedia's policies on copyright and content usage. I apologize for any inadvertent violations I may have made in my contributions to the Protist article. I completely understand the importance of adhering to these guidelines to ensure the integrity and legality of the content on Wikipedia.

I will take your feedback to heart and make sure that any future contributions I make to Wikipedia are in full compliance with the copyright and attribution requirements. If I use any information from sources, I will ensure that I properly paraphrase the content and provide accurate citations to avoid any potential copyright or plagiarism issues.

Thank you for your vigilance in maintaining the quality and authenticity of Wikipedia's content. If I have any further questions or concerns, I will not hesitate to reach out for clarification. Magadhahistorian (talk) 06:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replies to warnings written by AI do not show understanding of the warnings

Is that clear? AI generated text as a response is meaningless and a bit insulting. It doesn't suggest that you actually read any of the links or put any thought into your replies. For instance I see no evidence you read the links involving the use of sources as you continue to use sources that are unreliable and/or don't back the text. This doesn't mean all of your sources are unreliable. Look at this one for instance.[1]. Reliable or unreliable, and why? Doug Weller talk 07:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Doug Weller, That's not AI generated . I actually written it by my own after reading your message . Magadhahistorian (talk) 08:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it's pretty extraordinary that your English is perfect, and full of business-letter clichés, in most of your responses above, whereas there are just a few posts in simple and rather ungrammatical English, that you seem to have written yourself, including this reply right here, with grammar errors like 'I written it' and 'by my own'. Also this and this. In other words, it's very difficult to believe what you say. Bishonen | tålk 10:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]

And I ran it through an AI detector.[2]. This is the text I used:\"I completely understand the importance of maintaining the accuracy and credibility of Wikipedia articles, and I acknowledge that reliable sources are essential to support any edits made to the page. I will take your advice to heart and ensure that I follow the guidelines outlined in Wikipedia:Citing sources.

In the future, before making any further edits, I will be sure to discuss potentially controversial changes on the article's talk page to seek input from the community and ensure a collaborative and transparent approach.

Again, I apologize for any inconvenience my previous actions may have caused, and I appreciate your guidance. If you have any further suggestions or concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know. I am committed to improving my contributions and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation."

The detector said "7/7 sentences are likely AI generated.". Doug Weller talk 10:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have continued to use unreliable sources, and you obviously let a chatbot do your talking. It's interesting to compare the bot posts with the kind of English you use on your own, as here and here. See also Doug Weller's use of an AI detector, mentioned above. You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent disruptive editing. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. But be warned: if you use AI to write an unblock appeal, the reviewing admin will be able to tell, and will reject it. Bishonen | tålk 14:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]