User talk:Maestroukr

Image tagging for Image:Bethel2003.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bethel2003.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

" I want to make the title match the name in the biography"

Does that mean you've written a biography about yourself (other than as a portion of your userpage to help people understand who a contributor is, etc etc? - and one doesn't place the same categories on a userpage, generally, it's not in the same "namespace", etc. ... it goes on...)? If so, please read

Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines

and in particular

The key rule is to not write about yourself, nor about the things you've done or created. If they are encyclopedic, somebody else will notice them and write an article about them.

Very much hope you will join our project and apply your knowledge to creating a more helpful and useful encyclopedia, musical and otherwise, and that you have already done so- just that this is one of the rules within one understandably works here! Schissel | Sound the Note! 06:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving your user talk page

Welcome!

Hello, Maestroukr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Please do not move your user or user talk pages to the article space. This makes it impossible for people to communicate with you; and it also makes it apparent that you are using Wikipedia as a vehicle for self-promotion. Please do not write articles about yourself, or include yourself in other articles. While I wish you well in your career, we cannot use Wikipedia as a promotional space; it's one of our core policies, which you will see in the welcome template above. Please also look at the Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines as noted by Schissel above. Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to message at User_talk:Antandrus. Sergei Lysenko 00:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yuriy Leonovich

Lets see, second party sources, simply what has been written about Yuriy Leonovich that was not written by him, by his friends or by his agents. Are those that have written about him considered reliable, i.e. music critics, arts and culture reporters at major newspapers. Where there quotes on websites of TV stations etc. that you can use. That is the first step to create an article. Have fun Alf^Photoman 17:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indicating where to find it is enough, for example Title publication's name (number if periodical) date. A little warning though, it is tempting to include articles that have a one-line mention. There are enough editors on wikipedia that also read these papers and sooner or later it comes back---HARD Alf^Photoman 19:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better yet, the guideline states: A topic is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, independent of the subject and independent of each other. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial, or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Ultimately, and most importantly, all content must be attributable

Alf^Photoman 19:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to scan the clipping, if you can cite the paper it was in, the date, the title and the author that is OK, if someone does not believe you he/she can move his/her bulk into the next library and check it. The online references are better in the article. Create a section (if it does not exist) by putting == References == at the end of the existing text text and after thatlist like :

reference 1
reference 2

....

reference x

lots of luck Alf^Photoman 22:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yuriy_Leonovich is not the appropriate place to post information about yourself, because it is in the part of Wikipedia where encyclopaedic articles are written. A "userpage" at User:Maestroukr, however, is available for personal information about yourself. When adding personal information please remember that Wikipedia is not MySpace. Your userpage is for anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It is a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information.

No content in Category:Compositions of Gaspar Cassado

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Compositions of Gaspar Cassado, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Compositions of Gaspar Cassado has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Compositions of Gaspar Cassado, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Handel - solo cello

There is indeed a Passicalia Theme and Variations for Violoncello solo by G. Handel as I have it before me at this very instance!!! Just because you do not know the piece please do not delete before you investigate about it. It is a great piece! Very difficult to play . In fact there is a recording of it here [1] played by Tim Hugh (a very fine cellist indeed and well known!) But even he does not play all the Variations as printed. I do have the CD as well! You can find it on that page CD 2 down by # 14. And it is indeed for SOLO CELLO! Swanstone 18:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The CD says it was "arr. Halverson" as you can see (CD2 # 14) My music, which is a russian edition says in Russian the name " Дынова " as the editor/ arranger. As far as I can translate the name would be something like Dynova or Dinoff. ? I do know the version for Violin and cello as I have played it many times. And this definitely is based on the duo version. Swanstone 20:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"arr. Zinoviy Dynov" Thank you so much for finding that! I have been wondering for years who did the arrangment. Bravo! Swanstone 20:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would that be "Zinoviy Dynov" or "Zinovij Dynov"? Swanstone 21:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edition I have of the Handel is an old Russian one. I would imagine that it is out of print. But I could be wrong. I havn't been to Russia in a few years.Swanstone 17:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Davidov-Karl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Davidov-Karl.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

fact tag

Presumably you have a reason for removing a fact tag while not providing citations? I do not doubt the facts provided- but someone may, and a citationless Wikipedia page is considered a bad thing (by me. By others. By the guideline pages of this site.) for good reason. Wikipedia:Citing sources (and more importantly, Wikipedia:Verifiability) does not exactly cover this case, but apply sense: the page should not be without citation, and the habit of just removing fact tags with nothing else done is not one to get into. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cello Concerto in D minor (Cassadó)

The article Cello Concerto in D minor (Cassadó) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over five years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich von Mulert moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Friedrich von Mulert, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Friedrich von Mulert (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goldsztajn was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Russian language sources are self-published and cannot be considered reliable. The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Music and Musicians (1938, p.1227) has a brief entry on von Mulert.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Friedrich von Mulert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Friedrich von Mulert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Goldsztajn (talk) 13:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Friedrich von Mulert

Hello, Maestroukr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Friedrich von Mulert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]