User talk:Madona Jace

Welcome!

Hello, Madona Jace, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Madona Jace, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Madona Jace

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Madona Jace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello Madona Jace. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Madona Jace. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Madona Jace|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 01:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Am I only to declare on my userpage without anything to follow? no mentions or such? because I think Jimfbleak blocked me from posting anything on my userpage. I just wanted to make sure because it also has a warning that if I violated further, I might get banned. Madona Jace (talk) 03:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my userpage, I have already disclosed my employer Madona Jace (talk) 03:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the disclosure. Here are some pages for you to look at before you get started:

Your first article
Wikipedia:Golden rule - minimum standards that are required for a draft article to merit publication here
Articles for creation to guide you to creating a draft (overlaps with Your First Article above).

Good luck. Feel free to ask a question on my talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does this mean that I am allowed to repost the article that was deleted and just allow other editors to edit my work? Madona Jace (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I replied to you on User talk:Anachronist, I have restored the deleted revisions of your user page so that you may retrieve a past revision and paste it into a draft page. You can improve it there and submit it for review (see the links I posted above, particularly Wikipedia:Articles for creation, which is the only venue available to you to write an article because you have a conflict of interest). Anyone can edit it. Anything you write on Wikipedia isn't "your" work; neither you nor the subject of the article has any ownership or editorial control of the content. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thankj you for declaring your conflict of interest, please read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Much of your text was unsourced or sourced to unsuitable sites like LinkedIn, and the refs were bare urls. The tone was promotional and yoiu used non-standard capitalisation for your headings and text; full caps, in particular, are never correct. Your external links were inappropriate, you shouldn't just link everything he's ever done.

As a national politician, he's probably notable, but you still need proper refs, surely a national politician must have been mentioned in an official source or election return?. Also don't use bullet lists, write in sentences.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Also see eg Barack Obama as an example of a politician's article Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have already published the new article as a draft. please help me edit it and have it published as soon as possible. thank you for all your help! Madona Jace (talk) 07:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Golez has been accepted

Anthony Golez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Madona Jace (talk) 03:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead versus body of articles

The Lead is supposed to summarize important content that is covered at greater length (and referenced) in the body of the article. Your Gomez article has a lot of content in the Lead that is not referenced there, nor expanded upon and referenced elsewhere. David notMD (talk) 03:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! please send me a link for that specific guideline so I can review and maybe edit it myself according to that standard since I'm still having trouble navigating wikipedia features. Thank you! Madona Jace (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section is the guideline. Given that that article exists and your connection is paid, you are now limited to making edit requests on the Talk page and then asking for a reviewer to decide in your edit requests. Basically, you need to create a paragraph of his pre-election career, with references. David notMD (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]