User talk:Madhouseplug

Welcome!

Hello, Madhouseplug, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Madhouseplug/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 13:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Madhouseplug/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Madhouseplug/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 13:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Madhouseplug. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Madhouseplug/sandbox

Hello, Madhouseplug. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VINVAE (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VINVAE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Madhouseplug! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do I need to do please? Madhouseplug (talk) 17:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinvae (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, VINVAE, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinvae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, replacing the words "Your reason here" with an explanation of why you think you should be unblocked.

Yamla (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madhouseplug (talk) 17:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your email. However, that does make you a sockpuppet account. Please review WP:SOCK and WP:UPE. Please communicate to your client that they need to stop this unethical behaviour immediately. --Yamla (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Does this mean that in cases where a friend or family member needs a page, I wouldn't be able to create it for them, even if it's not a paid job? Madhouseplug (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't going to be lifting this block while VINVAE's manager keeps on recruiting accounts to illicitly promote their client. If that stops permanently, there's a chance you may be unblocked in the future. You'll need to account for your violation of WP:UPE, convince us we can trust you not to engage in such behaviour again, and ensure you thoroughly understand and will comply with WP:PROMO. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. But again, no chance until VINVAE's manager permanently ceases their spamming. --Yamla (talk) 18:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have read WP:GAB and i have understood properly, i have also submitted an appeal. I will wait for your consideration and i promise not to violate these rules again. Thank you very much, i will also reach out to the manager to put a stop to the spamming further.

Thank you Madhouseplug (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madhouseplug (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #93386 has been closed, with an instruction to post any future unblock request here. JBW (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please i want to ask if i have been unblocked or if i have to do any other thing to get my account back? Madhouseplug (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid not. Please follow the instructions in the block notice. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have, i have made an appeal and it was declined. I do not know what else to do again. Please i have followed all the instructions and i have appealed to both admins even through the block evasion portal. It was declined Madhouseplug (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madhouseplug (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions on how to post a request for an unblock are given in the notice above telling you that this account is blocked. JBW (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have followed the instructions and requested for the unblock again. Thank you Madhouseplug (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please i want to remind you concerning my unblock request. Thank you Madhouseplug (talk) 11:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not requested unblocking (at least not on this page, which is what you were specifically told to do). You need to format your request as instructed in the block notice above, for it to appear on the administrators' feed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have done that now. Thank you Madhouseplug (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you most certainly have not. I'll also note the WP:SOCK violations continued after this account was blocked. I therefore oppose unblocking, but don't object if a future unblock reviewer disagrees. --Yamla (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to clear myself multiple times. I am not Muraina Lateef. That person is not me. I haven't been able to do anything since I got blocked. I have done the unblock request as instructed on top of this page, I have copied the code and inputted my unblock request and replied. Please is there something else I need to do or another route to do this? Please Madhouseplug (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not done that. Everyone can plainly see you have not made an unblock request here. And nobody cares whether or not you are Muraina Lateef, you were violating WP:SOCK. You were solicited to edit on behalf of a blocked editor. We know this. You know this. --Yamla (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]