User talk:Macrobreed2/2024/September

Archives

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiladitya Chetia (June 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not notable.

Qcne (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Macrobreed2, just saw your comment on the draft.

If you want to continue to work on the draft then feel free, and ping me on my user talk page if you think the person is notable.

However in it's present state it is totally unsuitable for Wikipedia:

- three sections have no sources.

- I do not think this person is fundamentally notable, please read WP:BLP1E.

- I am really concerned that you have written your draft using ChatGPT or another Large Language Model? It has all the hallmarks of being generated by a Chatbot. Don't do that.

Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Qcne, Thank you for your detailed feedback.

- The person in question has recently deceased, and a lot of new reference articles are currently being published on the topic. I will add these references accordingly and will ping you once I have done so.

- I have read and understood the possible issues of notability as per WP:BLP1E.

- I have indeed taken help from GPT-4o for writing the article, but I will work on neutralizing and improving the draft myself.

Thank you once again for taking the time to explain the issues. I appreciate your help :-)

Best regards, Macrobreed2 (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Qcne, I have made the necessary changes to Draft:Shiladitya Chetia and fixed most of the issues. I would like you to review the draft once again. I have not applied it for AFC again as you have added the STOP warning. Kindly let me know the outcome. Regards, Macrobreed2 (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Macrobreed2 thanks, I have reverted the rejection and re-submitted it. Qcne (talk) 12:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiladitya Chetia (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shiladitya Chetia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]