User talk:MOFcreator

Hello MOFcreator, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

MOFcreator, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 04:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Peer Review From Doc JML

In general your new page is much better than the existing one. You provide more narrative materials and add new sections which makes the page more readable. The history section is the best for arranging the historical events as a list. For the properties section, there are only some descriptions about the properties and these descriptions look kind of disorder. Maybe there should be some space between different paragraph. Also for some physical and chemical properties, it will be easy to find a specific item if you arrange them in table, not a narrative paragraph. Also I think there may be more properties that you could find and provide in this section, like in the existing page, it has a lot of tables of varies properties. For the synthesis section, You showed a general method to synthesize the Polybenzimidazole, but I guess there must be more methods and maybe you need to provide more methods and elaborate the relationship of different methods, advantages and disadvantages. Also in this section, you use some Chemdraw structures pictures which are very impressive and informative. But I am not very sure whether these pictures are your own work. If not, I suggest you ask for permission from the authors. Another suggestion about this section is the typesetting. There are too much space among the pictures and paragraphs, which looks a bit messy. I suggest you find a better way to arrange them. For the application section, you provide several different fields which is more than welcome. But it seems that each one takes the same proportion and only has one paragraph general description. I suggest you provide a link to each of this application item, which will be very helpful to non-expert readers if they want to know more about these. Also I think you may pick one representative application and give more description about it. Overall, you did a fabulous job. Your page is very updated, informative and comprehensive.Hope my little suggestion helpful.

Doc JML — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocJML (talk • contribs) 14:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)