User talk:MMiller324

Welcome!

Hi MMiller324! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristel Gomez Espinoza has been accepted

Cristel Gomez Espinoza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sato (September 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Atsme was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The topic is about dog rescue which is contrary to WP:NOTADVOCATE. We already have Dog and Mongrel articles.

Atsme 💬 📧 00:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MMiller324! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Atsme 💬 📧 00:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malvina Latour (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This needs WAY better sourcing if it is to be accepted as an article. At least some historians have written that Malvina Latour is legendary and did not exist at all. E.g. this article summarizes content in this book (which I cannot access). The article writes: "Long also notes that this account seems to have invented its queen, Malvina Latour, who does not appear in any census, church, or city records. In 1886 George Washington Cable wrote that Latour was the successor to the infamous Voodoo queen Marie Laveau, and fifty years later the Louisiana Writers' Project manuscript on Voodoo suggested that Latour was Laveau's successor and daughter. The assumption of authorship and the "life" Malvina Latour took on after her introduction to New Orleans Voodoo lore are indicative of how such sensational accounts came to be regarded as historical and factual (Long, A New Orleans Voudou Priestess: The Legend and Reality of Marie Laveau [Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2006], 127, 195, 251n17)." Latour seems like a fascinating subject from an article but this article needs to be based on high-quality scholarly sources, not random primary sources etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malvina Latour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malvina Latour = Lala?

Hallo, Could you show which of your sources links these two people as being the same? See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. Thanks. PamD 09:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sato

Hello, MMiller324. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sato, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]