User talk:MMXVI

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MMXVI. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Ethanlu121 (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cross-User Defacement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attacks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Article

I have a request, I want a page to be created in English named: Syed Aman Mian Sharma, he is notable, he is an Indian Child Actor, this article is already on him https://hi.wikipedia.org/s/al4o but the problem is that it is in hindi. I can Give you more than 25 references and i have also made source code for it so you only have to create the article and add or remove points that i have already made. If You are ok. We can talk further. This is one of the 29 references i can give you - Read This http://www.fuzionproductions.com/sony-tvs-upcoming-show-peshwa-bajiraos-syed-aman-mian-speaks-character-show/ Regards MumbaikarLaunda (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go

I can create that article. Kindly put a proper name to that article. Is "Syed Aman Mian Sharma" the appropriate name which will do the needful? GH0ST 08:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning on Rishabh Bishnoi's talk page

Please do not warn editors for edits they've already been blocked for. Also, please do not impersonate an administrator, either on your user page or in your signature. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MMXVI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Muhandes. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 22:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BBSBU

The university is small in influence and social reach. The only way for masses to communicate is Facebook page. If social media links don't seem good as you mentioned then; at least website and fb link should be given as contact info either in info-bar or external links.

Feel free to revert wb_admin (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted. WP:EL makes no exceptions for such a case. --Muhandes (talk) 11:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hama revenge massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hama revenge massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hama revenge massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Editor abcdef (talk) 06:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It should be included

The reason being that scores of massacres have been done and it sends just another one.

Only because just few hundreds of people have died and not thousands; does not mean it is not a massacre. Wikipedia is full with massacres where only few died.

The impact is definitely remarkable to be mentioned in history books.

Kindly suggest why someone has requested it for deletion? wb_admin (talk) 05:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hint: the message says very explicitly where the discussion is taking place. Make your comments over there. --Muhandes (talk) 11:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BeEF moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, BeEF, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 17:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then help!

Kindly help in adding info rather than turning wiki red wb_admin (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MMXVI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haazik Kazi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haazik Kazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Require approval

Please review my article and publish. Thank-you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bad bleeder (talk • contribs) 11:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to mention the article name. Do not worry, this time. I'll check from logs.

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

??

I do not have multiple accounts. If there is any other thats fake. I never broke any wiki policy. Additionally, I ask and encourage ppl to create wiki accounts... my colleague told me thathis acc was also blocked..

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MMXVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm helping a new colleague in creating wiki articles. Please check my contributions. I always try to do the right thing. I don't need extra accounts. I'm aware about the reasons if I had to. wb_admin (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if you are two different people, it is impossible for us to tell you and Bad bleeder apart from each other – both behaviorally and through our system logs, you are indistinguishable. See WP:COWORKER. This is probably going to come up eventually, so you might want to say whether you're being paid to edit Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MMXVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

as discussed above, ill comply with co:worker guidelines and use separate IP machiene and add the userboxes for the same. Please advise any further action I've to perform. Thank you for quick response. wb_admin (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Multiple open unblock requests are not needed. I will leave the other one open. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MMXVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kindly update, as mentioned above I'll comply with the CO:Worker policy and please advise any further action from my side. Please unblock fast. Wikipedia_Editor (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MMXVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23819 was submitted on Jan 24, 2019 14:21:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MMXVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ReWriting reason for unblock. Due to co-worker using the account, my account was blocked. I have advised the co-worker to use only personal device for account logIn thereby mitigating any chance of block (by bot) in future. I always; and will in future comply with wikipedia policies. Wikipedia_Editor (talk) 13:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were asked two times (here on this page) whether you are paid for editing, yet you refuse to answer. We can't proceed if you are not willing to cooperate. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please update me if I've to create another account for editing or expect a quick resolution.

If you create a new account, it will be blocked - and it will be much more difficult to get unblocked at that point. Additionally, you were not blocked by a bot, but by a checkuser with access to system logs. If I understand correctly, you are saying that a coworker was using your device to edit. On January 19th, there is overlap between your edits and the other accounts edits, with as little as 3 minutes between accounts switching, on the same articles. Do you have an explanation for that? Are you being paid to edit wikipedia? SQL ^{Query me!} 21:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Statement 1: I've a dedicated VM I'm my phone which is connected to x country with the policy of always-on and no connections happen if the vpn is down for some reason. And that is my own VPN so it is not mentioned as a proxy by wikipedia. I'm not using it neither want to use. It has a separate browser. Even the user agent is not informative. I don't use headers like X-Forwaded-for or client-via at proxy level. In short it is not only difficult but straight away impossible to detect any such activity if I did.

Statement 2: Regarding the edits, I'm aware about the article he was editing, so I was also editing the same as it was his first time. However, if I need to justify this action even after confirming that he will not use the same IP and network. Then I've nothing more to say.

Just to add, I'm not justifying any further not for the sake of arrogance or ego but it will be stupidity on my side to waste my time further.

I learn by editing wikipedia, if any checkuser or unchecked user hinders my learning....

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MMXVI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As mentioned by vangajenie to answer the question whether I am paid to edit Wikipedia or not, I believe that it was clear from my previous responses, however categorically speaking, I'm paid a Dollar in 2 minutes, tax-free (middle east); for my job as an engineer. Directly responding to the question: I am not paid to edit Wikipedia neither I will accept any money for it in future. If you are a new user who is reading my unblock request please refer to my previous comment made a few hours earlier on the same page. Wikipedia_Editor (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of World Informatix Cyber Security

The article World Informatix Cyber Security has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage in reliable sources other than mere mentions of their involvement in the Bangladesh Bank robbery. Also note that article's initial editor was banned for sockpuppetting.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]