User talk:M00cherman

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Welcome! Hello, M00cherman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Jet123 20:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Washington Redskins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pats1 ^T/C 00:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Austin Cole"

A page you created, Austin Cole, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Wrong warning--anyway, "do do do" doesn't particularly describe Piano Sonata No. 11 (Mozart) more than any other work, so I reverted your edit. No big deal. LovesMacs (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Zack L. Jacobs

A tag has been placed on Zack L. Jacobs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Templarion (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User talk:Templarion constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. _David ^WS _(contribs) 21:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jack Cole (choreographer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LovesMacs (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jack Cole (choreographer). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 21:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:WadeSimMiser. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 21:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

As Luna says, this appears like it could be true; there is some vandalism in this account's past, but only a handful compared to what appear to be a few dozen valid edits. Don't let it happen again, and slap your friends.

Request handled by: Golbez (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:Hmm... all too frequently, this sort of excuse is dismissed out of hand, but here I think we should be more willing to offer a second chance -- the history of prior contribs from this account is very helpful, there. I'd tentatively support reducing or releasing the block, with a reminder to you to revisit the subject of your computer or account's security. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]