User talk:M. Abdollahi

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, M. Abdollahi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like MONA Consultants, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MONA Consultants

The article MONA Consultants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MONA Consultants

A tag has been placed on MONA Consultants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 05:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at MONA Consultants

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with MONA Consultants. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with MONA Consultants. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WuhWuzDat 14:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

If you want your RfA to go live, you have to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship all the way through, which means transcluding it to the main RfA page. Otherwise nobody will see your RfA or be able to vote in it. However I have to suggest that running an RfA right now is not a good idea, and will not help you get your article to stay on Wikipedia. Wikipedia administrators have no special privileges with regard to what kind of pages they can write. If you want to create an article for your company I would recommend building it on your user page and seeing if you can build it up to the point that it satisfies all the requirements of notability and verifiability before returning it to the mainspace. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 03:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kolahghermezi

A tag has been placed on Kolahghermezi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kolahghermezi

The article Kolahghermezi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable; only reference is YouTube

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MONA Consultants

A tag has been placed on MONA Consultants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. →javért ^breakaway 04:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. →javért ^breakaway 04:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Power Industry

A tag has been placed on Power Industry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. →javért ^breakaway 05:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI conflict of interest guideline

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article MONA Consultants, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.

Please note as well that if you repeatedly re-create an article which has been deleted as per Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, your account may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Athaenara ✉ 05:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, please don't create articles that consist only of links to other Wikipedia articles. An article must have some written content and must satisfy the criteria WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS. Thank you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mona logo.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Mona logo.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mona Logo.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Mona Logo.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kolah ghermezi1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kolah ghermezi1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kolahghermezi.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kolahghermezi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kolahghermezi

The article Kolahghermezi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established; sources consist mainly of YouTube videos. Needs to be improved greatly if it's to be kept.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. clpo13_(talk) 06:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need some help?

You seem to be having trouble with your Wikipedia articles. I understand that starting out on Wikipedia can be frustrating, and I'd like to help. For example, Kolahghermezi looks to me like a good start for an article, except for the fact that it doesn't have any reliable sources.

I want you to understand -- reliable sources aren't optional. Every article needs them, or else there's nothing we can write about, because everything on Wikipedia is meant to be verifiable.

But I see the potential for some useful articles here, and it sounds like reliable sources could be found. So I've removed the deletion tags on Kolahghermezi and Reza Feiz Noroozi. I'd like to save these articles if at all possible.

But I know nothing about Iranian television or cinema, so I'm going to need your help finding the sources. Have there been books or newspaper or magazine articles that mention Reza Feiz Noroozi or Kolah Ghermezi? If you found just two reliable printed sources, for example, that would be enough to make sure the article stays on Wikipedia.

I've searched the Internet for Kolah Ghermezi and Reza Feiz Noroozi. For Kolah Ghermezi, all I can find by searching in English is people's opinions. Searching for Reza Feiz Noroozi doesn't find me enough either -- I mostly get pages that say nothing except that he's an actor, and half of them got that from Wikipedia. (If we said Reza Feiz Noroozi was a brand of sliced bread, half the Internet would be saying that instead. That's why we need reliable sources!)

It seems like these sources should exist. It's okay if they're not available on the Web (I've occasionally gone to a library to check on Wikipedia sources that are only available in print), and it's okay if they're not in English (but I might want you to help me understand the translation).

Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. This looks like a valuable topic area that's not covered very well by Wikipedia. I hope that with your knowledge about the topic we can make the articles work.

rspεεr (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond. If you keep just creating new articles without taking care of the ones you've already created, these deletion notices are just going to pile up. We really need you to help us find reliable sources for your facts. rspεεr (talk) 07:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Feiz Noroozi

Also, a more specific question. IMDb lists Reza Feiz Noroozi as Norouzi, not Noroozi as you had it. Can you confirm that this is the same person you were thinking about? I'm guessing it's just a translation error but I think we should follow what our current source says. If we have more, then we can change it back with a note. Just post a note on my talk page. Thanks! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine it's not an "error" as much as it is a case of multiple possible transliterations. But I agree that our name should agree with IMDB's. I followed through on that and moved it to Reza Fieze Norouzi (that is, I changed the "Feiz" to "Fieze" as well). rspεεr (talk) 10:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MONA Consultants

A tag has been placed on MONA Consultants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ceranthor 15:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MONA-Consultants

A tag has been placed on MONA-Consultants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. →javért ^breakaway 05:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MONA-Consultants

A tag has been placed on MONA-Consultants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. →javért ^breakaway 05:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mona blue.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mona blue.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 22:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks)

Articles for deletion nomination of Kolah Ghermezi

I have nominated Kolah Ghermezi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolah Ghermezi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tim Song (talk) 08:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]