User talk:Lysglimt

Oslo Weather

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Oslo Weather, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Leuko 17:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Access1.gif}

Thank you for uploading Image:Access1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Access i.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Access i.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hans Jørgen Lysglimt

The article Hans Jørgen Lysglimt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Hans Jørgen Lysglimt. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lysglimt: In addition to the problem mentioned above by Mentoz86, you created this article in Norwegian on the English-language Wikipedia. If this was a mistake, here is the link to create it on the Norwegian (bokmål) Wikipedia. I have translated it here, but please do not write in Norwegian on the English-language Wikipedia. Foreign-language articles are often simply deleted here, which is a waste of everyone's time. I would have added a template in Norwegian and English with the same message, but I see that you have been editing here since 2007. English only here, please! Ask me on my talkpage if you have any further questions. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Premium email for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Premium email is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premium email until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]