Jump to content

User talk:Luxorr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Luxorr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Teahouse Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Luxorr, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hague, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binnenhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spui (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hague, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buitenhof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinatown, The Hague, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish quarter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of legislative buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bundesrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Den Haag Hollands Spoor railway station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Laakkwartier]], [[Rijswijk]], Hoornbrug, Broekpolder, Spoorzone [[Delft]], [[Delft railway station|Delft Station]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Den Haag Centraal railway station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Haag Hollands Spoor railway station|Station Hollands Spoor]], Laakkwartier, [[Rijswijk]], Hoornbru], Broekpolder, P+R Hoornwijck, [[Ypenburg]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Den Haag Centraal railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Buitenhof
Den Haag Hollands Spoor railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Buitenhof

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Holland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glasshouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of the Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reprocessing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Provincial politics in the Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page States Provincial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Holland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of municipalities in South Holland

[edit]

Hi, I'm Polyglot. Luxorr, thanks for creating List of municipalities in South Holland!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page needs to be merged with List of cities, towns and villages in South Holland

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Polyglot (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Floris Adriaan van Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your contributions to articles relating to the Netherlands. In particular, your contributions to the Next Dutch general election drew my attention. gidonb (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totalbiscuit

[edit]

Thanks for your cleanup of the article, but that lede is far too long now. Do you have any suggestions for how to fix that? Why did you remove the section? Willhesucceed (talk) 16:52, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the content of the section to the lede because I personally thought it was fairly general information that didn't really require a section, but if you think the lede is too long now, we can put the section back. Luxorr (talk) 12:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nissewaard) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Nissewaard, Luxorr!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work - thank you for contributing!

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Luxorr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Luxorr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alderman

[edit]

I'm by no means an expert on Dutch politics, but in English-speaking countries "alderman" and "municipal councillor" aren't different things at all — they're simply older and newer terms for the same thing, with "alderman" having been deprecated in favour of the more gender-neutral "councillor" once it started becoming common for women to be "aldermen" too. I'm certainly willing to consider that the terms may be used differently than that in the Netherlands — but our article about alderman doesn't actually contain any content about the Netherlands at all to clarify that, and none of the articles that were in the "aldermen" tree were very clear about a potential distinction either — nearly all of them used the word "aldermen" only in the category itself, while the body text just said they served on the municipal council without ever once using the word "alderman" at all. So even if there is a different distinction between the two terms in the Netherlands than there is in Canada or the United States or the United Kingdom or Australia, the relevant articles aren't actually explaining or reliably sourcing what it is.

So that lack of information would need to be fixed, and a lot of the people's articles would also need to be much clearer about which thing they were, before we could justify having two separate category trees for them. And even if they are genuinely separate positions in the Netherlands, that's so different from the way the terms are used in English-speaking countries (not to mention probably having a lot of overlap among people who had held both roles at different times) that it would simply be confusing to most readers and would most likely be mistaken for a redundant category scheme again in the future. So even then, it might still be preferable to find some other alternate term (e.g. "Municipal politicians of X" or "Municipal officeholders of X") that can encompass both titles, so that they're still kept together in one tree instead of two separate ones. But what it ultimately comes down to, more than anything else, is that the articles themselves aren't really making a very clear distinction between the two titles — so if there really is one, then a lot of articles need to be improved to communicate it better. Bearcat (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums § Proposed merger of articles about elections in the Caribbean Netherlands and Netherlands Antilles

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums § Proposed merger of articles about elections in the Caribbean Netherlands and Netherlands Antilles. ― Ætoms [talk] 20:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial results tables

[edit]

Good work on these, but could you please add a source? Unsourced tables are at risk of being deleted and editors need to be able to verify the figures. Cheers, Number 57 12:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been adding sources because they're the same as those listed in the national results tables (eg this), but I can add them to the provincial results sections as well if you think that would be better. Luxorr (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zeeland Religion: Undid revision 1081988765

[edit]

On Zeeland Religion you wonder why there is a graph about the whole of the Netherlands in article about a province.

Well that's simple, because there was already (and now, due to the reversal again) an outdated graph that falsely claims to be about Zeeland, while the data is about the Netherlands as a whole. (View the source data at CBS.)

Ad Verburg (talk) 06:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did view the source data at CBS. The article used as a reference links to this table showing religious affiliation per province. The values it provides for Zeeland correspond with the ones shown in the graph on the Wikipedia page. Luxorr (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pirate Party (Netherlands), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middelburg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bas de Gaay Fortman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelical People's Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luxorr&oldid=1238227230"